From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757176Ab3BUWmp (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:42:45 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:20829 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755491Ab3BUWmn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:42:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:40:44 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Andrew Morton Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, lucho@ionkov.net, jack@suse.cz, ericvh@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rminnich@sandia.gov, tytso@mit.edu, martin.petersen@oracle.com, Artem Bityutskiy , neilb@suse.de, Adrian Hunter , david@fromorbit.com, gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, bharrosh@panasas.com, jlayton@samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ubifs: Wait for page writeback to provide stable pages Message-ID: <20130221224044.GB4055@blackbox.djwong.org> References: <20130119011231.20902.55954.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130119011316.20902.56721.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130123134312.b69c53cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20130221034834.GA4055@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130221143243.099bef3c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130221143243.099bef3c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:32:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:48:34 -0800 > "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: > > > > I grabbed the patches. They should appear in linux-next tomorrow if I > > > can get the current pooppile to build. > > > > Well... these patches have been banging around in -next for a month or so now. > > As far as I know there haven't been any complaints. Can we push these for 3.9? > > yup. You can normally assume that this is the case, unless the patches have > > a) been causing bugs or > > b) been getting rude review comments or > > c) been getting a great string of fix-fix-fix-fix patches in -mm or > > d) acquired rude akpm comments or unresolved questions against them > in http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/series I was simply making sure that I hadn't missed anything. :) --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html