From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1759966Ab3BYQOp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:14:45 -0500
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:53556 "EHLO
	cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1759945Ab3BYQOm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:14:42 -0500
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:14:35 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        keyrings@linux-nfs.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries
Message-ID: <20130225161435.GA18404@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <30665.1361461678@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <CA+55aFxyuvC1H6doSw_e_yLTey2YGWU9cLnUzxUeT2kaeazydA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130221164244.GA19625@srcf.ucam.org>
 <CA+55aFy4k07GPmszkBdYvCE-KphKLVowkZoW7hoAvcR+0U=stg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130221174955.GA20886@srcf.ucam.org>
 <CA+55aFxZ4f4KiHQBCAgTghm+deniS6rDz4wna9bce6vK8WppsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130222140539.GE20629@fenchurch.internal.datastacks.com>
 <877glw78p5.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <20130225154215.GB13605@srcf.ucam.org>
 <87obf85r51.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87obf85r51.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:50:50PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:46:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >> You could just drop the requirement that ring 0 code must be signed.
> >> I don't think Windows 8 enforces this, but I'm not yet sure if there
> >> is a physical presence check before you can enter a mode in which
> >> Windows loads self-signed kernel modules.
> >
> > Windows 8 will not load unsigned drivers if Secure Boot is enabled.
> 
> What about "bcdedit /set ... testsigning on"?

Windows 8 will not load unsigned drivers if Secure Boot is enabled.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org