From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758026Ab3BZGEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:04:41 -0500 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:49975 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752275Ab3BZGEk (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:04:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:04:28 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Dave Airlie Cc: Greg KH , Matthew Garrett , David Howells , Florian Weimer , Linus Torvalds , Josh Boyer , Peter Jones , Vivek Goyal , Kees Cook , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries Message-ID: <20130226060428.GD12906@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Dave Airlie , Greg KH , Matthew Garrett , David Howells , Florian Weimer , Linus Torvalds , Josh Boyer , Peter Jones , Vivek Goyal , Kees Cook , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20130226030249.GB23834@kroah.com> <20130226031338.GA29784@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226033156.GA24999@kroah.com> <20130226033803.GA30285@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226035416.GA1128@kroah.com> <20130226040456.GA30717@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226041324.GA7241@kroah.com> <20130226044521.GC12906@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:55:32PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So it would be nice if LF could undertake to go and talk to Microsoft, > and get vague opinions turned into something real. Uh, folks like James and Greg K-H have talked to folks at Microsoft.... I haven't talked to the folks at Microsoft personally, but my understanding is that did _not_ tell us we had to do what Matthew claims other folks at Mircrosoft have claimed that we have to do, "or else". > Ted you might be at liberty to get a chromebook pixel from google, but > that isn't going to help the other X% of users who have a PC they want > to use Linux on, and maybe boot Windows to do their taxes. The point is that users will have choices. It wasn't the end of the world when some laptop manufacturers shipped devices that required crappy Nvidia drivers. I just simply chose not to buy laptops that were crippled with the Optimus chipset, and purchased laptops that used Intel graphics instead. That's the free market at work. Yes, it's sad that some users got stuck buying hardware which screwed them over and made it very hard or impossible to use bleeding edge kernels. It's too bad some people had to learn the hard way. The good news though is that people who did do their due diligence could purchase open hardware, and not get screwed by peripherals that required proprietary drivers, whether they be WiFi or Graphics drivers. Of course, there are still crappy laptops that require proprietary drivers, or for which no Linux drivers exist at all. There's a reason why I buy Thinkpads and not Sony laptops. Similarly, the good news is that there are open x86 devices being sold right now, post Windows-8, which don't require us to be beholden to Microsoft. Yes, there will be users who buy the locked down crap. There are also users who buy Sony laptops. Sometimes, we can't help everyone, and somtimes, it's better not to encourage users to use hardware that require propietary drivers, but to rather incentize them to use open hardware instead. Regards, - Ted