From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756821Ab3BZKVY (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:21:24 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56767 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750926Ab3BZKVW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:21:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:21:11 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Raymond Jennings Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Dave Airlie , Greg KH , David Howells , Florian Weimer , Linus Torvalds , Josh Boyer , Peter Jones , Vivek Goyal , Kees Cook , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries Message-ID: <20130226102111.GA4229@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20130226033803.GA30285@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226035416.GA1128@kroah.com> <20130226040456.GA30717@srcf.ucam.org> <20130226041324.GA7241@kroah.com> <20130226044521.GC12906@thunk.org> <20130226060428.GD12906@thunk.org> <20130226063813.GA17317@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:07:22AM -0800, Raymond Jennings wrote: > Just curious here, but is this as much of an issue if a user is > somehow able to take ownership of his own machine? No, if you're doing your own key management then it's no problem at all. > I'm assuming this is related to TPM somehow. No, completely unrelated. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org