From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756787Ab3CDKns (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 05:43:48 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:23564 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756457Ab3CDKnr (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 05:43:47 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,778,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="270568227" Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:43:39 +0100 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Ian Lartey Cc: Grant Likely , Laxman Dewangan , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , Graeme Gregory Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: palmas: add in GPIO support for palmas charger Message-ID: <20130304104339.GA25973@sortiz-mobl> References: <1362157598-11458-1-git-send-email-ian@slimlogic.co.uk> <5131ACC3.10803@nvidia.com> <20130302193500.783693E1095@localhost> <5134758A.8010204@slimlogic.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5134758A.8010204@slimlogic.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ian, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:20:58AM +0000, Ian Lartey wrote: > On 02/03/13 19:35, Grant Likely wrote: > >On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:09:47 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >>On Friday 01 March 2013 10:36 PM, Ian Lartey wrote: > >>>Palmas charger has 16 GPIOs > >>>add palmas_gpio_[read|write|update] api to take account > >>>second bank of GPIOs > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey > >>>Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory > >>>--- > >> > >>Looks good. > >>Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan > >> > > > >Applied for v3.10, thanks. > > > >g. > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > Hello Grant, > > For this [v2] patch I missed out that this patch depends on > "[PATCH v2] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers." > I did have this noted in the first version of this patch - sorry. > > kbuild rightly complained about the patch > > Do you want to revert this patch until the > "mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by multiple drivers" > is also accepted ? You should send your patches as independent patchsets, to be applied in the right order. I'll ack the MFD patches and Grant could take both. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/