Re: [PATCH 0/4] mv643xx_eth: use mvmdio MDIO bus driver

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2455 bytes --]

From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:53:10 +0100

> Le 03/15/13 13:55, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:53:21 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>>> From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:08:31 +0100
>>>
>>>> This patch converts the mv643xx_eth driver to use the mvmdio MDIO bus
>>>> driver
>>>> instead of rolling its own implementation. As a result, all users of
>>>> this
>>>> mv643xx_eth driver are converted to register an "orion-mdio"
>>>> platform_device.
>>>> The mvmdio driver is also updated to support an interrupt line which
>>>> reports
>>>> SMI error/completion, and to allow traditionnal platform device
>>>> registration
>>>> instead of just device tree.
>>>>
>>>> David, I think it makes sense for you to merge all of this, since we
>>>> do
>>>> not want the architecture files to be desynchronized from the
>>>> mv643xx_eth to
>>>> avoid runtime breakage. The potential for merge conflicts should be
>>>> very small.
>>>
>>> All applied to net-next, thanks.
>>
>> Actually, reverted.  Please send me code which actually compiles:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c: In function
>> ‘orion_mdio_wait_ready’:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c:70:28: error: ‘NO_IRQ’
>> undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c:70:28: note: each undeclared
>> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c: In function ‘orion_mdio_probe’:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c:242:24: error: ‘NO_IRQ’
>> undeclared (first use in this function)
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.o] Error 1
>>
>> And don't use Kconfig dependencies to work around this, fix it
>> properly.
> 
> Is there any platform out there for which we do not have a NO_IRQ
> definition by now? If so, what is it?

Obviously if x86_64 doesn't even build your changes, that is one such
platform.  Also, is grep not working on your computer?

Platforms are absolutely no required to have this define, zero is the
only valid "no IRQ" which is portable in any way.

This is an old and tired topic, portable code does not use NO_IRQ, and
that's simply the end of it.
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥