linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/2] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Check Interrupt Flag modifier when registering probe
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:10:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130315044041.GC31866@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314115242.19690.33573.stgit@mhiramat-M0-7522>

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:52:43PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Currently kprobes check whether the copied instruction modifies
> IF (interrupt flag) on each probe hit. This means not only
> introducing overhead but also involving inat_get_opcode_attribute
> into kprobes hot path, and it can cause an infinit recursive
> call (and kernel panic in the end).
> 
> Actually, since the copied instruction itself never be modified
> on the buffer, it is needless to analyze the instruction every
> probe hit.
> 
> To fix this issue, we checks it only once when registering probe
> and store the result on ainsn->if_modifier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Reported-by: Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-15  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-14 11:52 [PATCH -tip v2 1/2] [BUGFIX] kprobes: make hash_64() as always inlined Masami Hiramatsu
2013-03-14 11:52 ` [PATCH -tip v2 2/2] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Check Interrupt Flag modifier when registering probe Masami Hiramatsu
2013-03-15  4:40   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2013-03-18 11:11   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2013-03-15  4:40 ` [PATCH -tip v2 1/2] [BUGFIX] kprobes: make hash_64() as always inlined Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-18 11:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] kprobes: Make " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130315044041.GC31866@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=timo.lindfors@iki.fi \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).