From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753795Ab3CRPuT (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:50:19 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:58000 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752567Ab3CRPuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:50:17 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:49:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-8-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Olof Johansson , Stephen Warren , Colin Cross , Peter De Schrijver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20130318153140.100bdf364d5614ce31f12eae@canb.auug.org.au> <51473179.2030306@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <51473179.2030306@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303181549.57080.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:a6yo83yd4G7oFmKxB6T7SWjG0dIbRrYEcN5mKuHJpQ0 Hy4BQOS91bucaWG/Fteb39sRPALont7nkpF42BXUevQWMNcx17 DyY/kldEnhl3F+XY6XbagJlJ003gOA95mcpLF055g+gbbwwPOG SISWI2o/eBDdZ8lchhpda3vhqgy0sz8mu2ViIB1MJ/YAcIYxKl RydRLWdb39+/CxkD7n6RZAWIEaNLx/V2otxi95TSj2HNOmk/is xJlQerJCgGcJYpkSLPIM26rZzT+flhgawMdG8/imQ2V4cH/K8V p6538NVn1tIyfQerAkZmFXcQRQzDkkMbZA6xsKiNy6utFuJHbC R+0kgsKrBuJDlmjyFU44= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 18 March 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/17/2013 10:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the tegra tree got a conflict in > > drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c between commit 1d16cfb3aeba > > ("clocksource: tegra20: use the device_node pointer passed to > > init") from the arm-soc tree and commit 6f88fb8af6c6 ("clocksource: > > tegra: move to of_clk_get") from the tegra tree. > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no > > action is required). > > Thanks. This resolution looks fine. > > Arnd/Olof, do you want me to rebase the Tegra branch onto some arm-soc > branch to resolve this conflict, or are you happy to simply resolve it > as below when pulling the Tegra branches into arm-soc for 3.10? No need to rebase. We can resolve this by merging the clksrc/cleanup into your branch when we pull it, or you can merge it yourself. Arnd