linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maxim V. Patlasov" <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu
Cc: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, xemul@parallels.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
	dev@parallels.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] fuse: fix accounting background requests (v2)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:01:53 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321140047.4051.6701.stgit@maximpc.sw.ru> (raw)

Hi,

The feature was added long time ago (commit 08a53cdc...) with the comment:

> A task may have at most one synchronous request allocated.  So these requests
> need not be otherwise limited.
>
> However the number of background requests (release, forget, asynchronous
> reads, interrupted requests) can grow indefinitely.  This can be used by a
> malicous user to cause FUSE to allocate arbitrary amounts of unswappable
> kernel memory, denying service.
>
> For this reason add a limit for the number of background requests, and block
> allocations of new requests until the number goes bellow the limit.

However, the implementation suffers from the following problems:

1. Latency of synchronous requests. As soon as fc->num_background hits the
limit, all allocations are blocked: both for synchronous and background
requests. This is unnecessary - as the comment cited above states, synchronous
requests need not be limited (by fuse). Moreover, sometimes it's very
inconvenient. For example, a dozen of tasks aggressively writing to mmap()-ed
area may block 'ls' for long while (>1min in my experiments).

2. Thundering herd problem. When fc->num_background falls below the limit,
request_end() calls wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq). This wakes up all waiters
while it's not impossible that the first waiter getting new request will
immediately put it to background increasing fc->num_background again.
(experimenting with mmap()-ed writes I observed 2x slowdown as compared with
fuse after applying this patch-set)

The patch-set re-works fuse_get_req (and its callers) to throttle only requests
intended for background processing. Having this done, it becomes possible to
use exclusive wakeups in chained manner: request_end() wakes up a waiter,
the waiter allocates new request and submits it for background processing,
the processing ends in request_end() where another wakeup happens an so on.

Changed in v2:
 - rebased on for-next branch of the fuse tree
 - fixed race when processing request begins before init-reply came

Thanks,
Maxim

---

Maxim V. Patlasov (4):
      fuse: make request allocations for background processing explicit
      fuse: add flag fc->uninitialized
      fuse: skip blocking on allocations of synchronous requests
      fuse: implement exclusive wakeup for blocked_waitq


 fs/fuse/cuse.c   |    3 ++
 fs/fuse/dev.c    |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 fs/fuse/file.c   |    6 +++--
 fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |    8 ++++++
 fs/fuse/inode.c  |    4 +++
 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
Signature

             reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-21 14:01 Maxim V. Patlasov [this message]
2013-03-21 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] fuse: make request allocations for background processing explicit Maxim V. Patlasov
2013-03-21 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] fuse: add flag fc->uninitialized Maxim V. Patlasov
2013-03-21 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] fuse: skip blocking on allocations of synchronous requests Maxim V. Patlasov
2013-03-21 14:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] fuse: implement exclusive wakeup for blocked_waitq Maxim V. Patlasov
2013-04-11 11:19 ` [fuse-devel] [PATCH 0/4] fuse: fix accounting background requests (v2) Maxim V. Patlasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130321140047.4051.6701.stgit@maximpc.sw.ru \
    --to=mpatlasov@parallels.com \
    --cc=dev@parallels.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).