From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755201Ab3DKIZY (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:25:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:49864 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753944Ab3DKIZV (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:25:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:25:19 -0700 From: Olof Johansson To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v6] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops and use them on Xen Message-ID: <20130411082519.GD31465@quad.lixom.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Arnd, Olof, > do you have any thoughts on this series? > Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree? > > The last patch, "xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen" has > a (small) dependency on this series: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136430893610688&w=2 > > would you be OK with taking that one too, or should that go through the > Xen tree? I think it'd make sense to get Russell to ack the changes to the core ARM code. We can merge the series through arm-soc, or he can take them, whatever is easiest for everybody. Given the dependencies on the second branch it might be easier to merge through Russell's tree. -Olof