From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966263Ab3DQL52 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:57:28 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:60732 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966144Ab3DQL51 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:57:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:56:41 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Lingzhu Xiang Cc: Luis Henriques , Matt Fleming , Josh Boyer , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" , "kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com" , Seiji Aguchi , Michael Schroeder Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/102] efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName Message-ID: <20130417115641.GG15755@dm> References: <1365414657-29191-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> <1365414657-29191-98-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> <1365547506.5814.36.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <51653E81.4090102@redhat.com> <20130410121730.GB3049@hercules> <20130411091256.GA11370@hercules> <20130416103321.GB3054@hercules> <516E2717.3020309@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <516E2717.3020309@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37:43PM +0800, Lingzhu Xiang wrote: > On 04/16/2013 06:33 PM, Luis Henriques wrote: > >68d929862e29a8b52a7f2f2f86a0600423b093cd efi: be more paranoid about available space when creating variables > > This prevents a bricking issue for some Samsung devices but causes > regression on many other machines. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55471 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/1078 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/47150 > > This patchset will fix it again: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/1081 Thanks for the pointer. I note that in that thread you yourself imply there are still issues after applying them? Was that accurate, is there yet further patches needed? -apw