From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758485Ab3ETXMJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2013 19:12:09 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:52240 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756021Ab3ETXMH (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2013 19:12:07 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: HwtnbVfCumlNjnE6wY2a9QHR/usuF7KLQMv1rowDd7t3 1369091525 Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:12:03 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Get rid of cpuinit? Message-ID: <20130520231203.GA21682@kroah.com> References: <519AA53F.1020107@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519AA53F.1020107@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:35:43PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > We have gotten rid of devinit markup. A recent patch of Linus' makes me > wonder if we similarly should get rid of cpuinit markup? > > Just as with devices, the CPU hotplug machinery has been leveraged to > support a number of pieces of functionality such as suspend, which means > that on anything but the most embedded systems this functionality is > likely needed anyway. > > On x86-64, for an "allyesconfig" build, the total amount of space in all > the .cpu* sections combined is 100K. No objection from me on removing it, it just causes problems from what I can tell. thanks, greg k-h