From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754191Ab3EVJdG (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 05:33:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:33271 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255Ab3EVJdE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 05:33:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:32:49 +0900 From: Tejun Heo To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PING^7 (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Corrections and customization of the SG_IO command whitelist (CVE-2012-4542)) Message-ID: <20130522093249.GC3466@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1360163761-8541-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <519C674A.50700@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519C674A.50700@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:35:54AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I'm not sure what is more ridiculous, whether the seven pings or the > lack of review... So, ummm, I don't know what Jens is thinking but at this point I'm basically waiting for someone else to pick it up as review to return ratio is too low to continue. It doesn't seem like I can get the series into a shape I can ack with reasonable amount of effort. My memory is kinda hazy now but here are two review points that came to my mind before giving up. * The response that I got after asking for justification basically boiled down to "it has to". Whatever that means. * In the patch series, fixes and feature changes are still mixed in order. I gave up after this. Thanks and good luck. -- tejun