From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759148Ab3FCWPU (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:15:20 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:34304 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758848Ab3FCWMw (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:12:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:12:11 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, John Stultz , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/6] sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock Message-ID: <20130603221210.GO18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1370155183-31421-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1370155183-31421-5-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20130603093938.GG18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <51AD069F.1060308@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51AD069F.1060308@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:11:59PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/03/13 02:39, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:39:41PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> +} > >> + > >> +void __init > >> +setup_sched_clock_64(u64 (*read)(void), int bits, unsigned long rate) > >> +{ > >> + if (cd.rate > rate) > >> + return; > >> + > >> + BUG_ON(bits <= 32); > >> + WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()); > >> + read_sched_clock_64 = read; > >> + sched_clock_func = sched_clock_64; > >> + cd.rate = rate; > >> + cd.mult = NSEC_PER_SEC / rate; > > Here, you don't check that the (2^bits) * mult results in a wrap of the > > resulting 64-bit number, which is a _basic_ requirement for sched_clock > > (hence all the code for <=32bit clocks, otherwise we wouldn't need this > > complexity in the first place.) > > Ok I will use clocks_calc_mult_shift() here. No, that's not the problem. If you have a 56-bit clock which ticks at a period of 1ns, then cd.rate = 1, and your sched_clock() values will be truncated to 56-bits. The scheduler always _requires_ 64-bits from sched_clock. That's why we have the complicated code to extend the 32-bits-or-less to a _full_ 64-bit value. Let me make this clearer: sched_clock() return values _must_ without exception monotonically increment from zero to 2^64-1 and then wrap back to zero. No other behaviour is acceptable for sched_clock().