From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756600Ab3FDQKY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 12:10:24 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:56821 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755879Ab3FDQKU (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 12:10:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:09:07 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: John Stultz Cc: Stephen Boyd , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King , "arm@kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly Message-ID: <20130604160907.GW27516@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1370155183-31421-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <51AD32A4.5070609@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51AD32A4.5070609@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: > On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month > > ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three > > and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit > > patches. The last three patches add 64 bit support and move the architected > > timers on ARM64 and ARM to use it. > > > Yea, so from the initial look over it, I think I'm happy with queuing > the first three patches, although I'd like to get some acks from arm > folks on at least the first two, just so no one is surprised with it > going through the -tip tree. The first two patches are pretty simple so, FWIW, you can add my ack on those: Acked-by: Will Deacon Will