From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756060Ab3FRKgR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:36:17 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:43331 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754367Ab3FRKgP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:36:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:35:35 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Jonas Jensen Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: irqchip: add support for MOXA ART SoCs Message-ID: <20130618103534.GW2718@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1371549584-7169-1-git-send-email-jonas.jensen@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371549584-7169-1-git-send-email-jonas.jensen@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:59:44AM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote: > +void moxart_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd) > +{ > + unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd); > + > + writel(1 << irq, IRQ_CLEAR(moxart_irq_base)); > +} > + > +static void moxart_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd) > +{ > + unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd); > + unsigned int mask; > + > + mask = readl(IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base)); > + mask &= ~(1 << irq); > + writel(mask, IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base)); > +} > + > +static void moxart_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd) > +{ > + unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd); > + unsigned int mask; > + > + mask = readl(IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base)); > + mask |= (1 << irq); > + writel(mask, IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base)); > +} Is there a reason this isn't using the irq_chip_generic stuff which would eliminate all the above?