From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933794Ab3FRWLS (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:11:18 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52124 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932479Ab3FRWLP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:11:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:11:14 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/48] 3.9.7-stable review Message-ID: <20130618221114.GA11055@kroah.com> References: <20130618161725.912524266@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:55:13PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 06/18/2013 11:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.7 release. > > There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Jun 20 16:15:42 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.7-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.82, 3.4.49, and 3.9.6 > > Compiled and booted on the following systems: > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5: > (3.4.50-rc1, and 3.9.7-rc1) > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics: > (3.0.83-rc1, 3.4.50-rc1, and 3.9.7-rc1) > > dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the > previous dmesgs for each of these releases. Great, thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h