* linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
@ 2013-06-19 8:00 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-19 14:38 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-06-19 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Ming Lei
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig among others) produced these warnings:
drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1254:12: warning: 'cache_firmware' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int cache_firmware(const char *fw_name)
^
drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1281:12: warning: 'uncache_firmware' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int uncache_firmware(const char *fw_name)
^
Revealed by commit 93232e46b209 ("firmware loader: don't export
cache_firmware and uncache_firmware") from the driver-core tree. These
are only used if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2013-06-19 8:00 linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related) Stephen Rothwell
@ 2013-06-19 14:38 ` Greg KH
2013-06-20 1:34 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2013-06-19 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Ming Lei
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:00:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig among others) produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1254:12: warning: 'cache_firmware' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int cache_firmware(const char *fw_name)
> ^
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1281:12: warning: 'uncache_firmware' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int uncache_firmware(const char *fw_name)
> ^
>
> Revealed by commit 93232e46b209 ("firmware loader: don't export
> cache_firmware and uncache_firmware") from the driver-core tree. These
> are only used if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.
Odd. Ming, can you send me a patch for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2013-06-19 14:38 ` Greg KH
@ 2013-06-20 1:34 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2013-06-20 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:00:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allnoconfig among others) produced these warnings:
>>
>> drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1254:12: warning: 'cache_firmware' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> static int cache_firmware(const char *fw_name)
>> ^
>> drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1281:12: warning: 'uncache_firmware' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> static int uncache_firmware(const char *fw_name)
>> ^
>>
>> Revealed by commit 93232e46b209 ("firmware loader: don't export
>> cache_firmware and uncache_firmware") from the driver-core tree. These
>> are only used if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.
>
> Odd. Ming, can you send me a patch for this?
No problem, will send you a patch together with the merge patch.
thanks,
--
Ming Lei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2013-06-06 7:32 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2013-06-06 7:59 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2013-06-06 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Greg KH, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c:921:13: warning: 'kill_requests_without_uevent' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Hmm, miss test with !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
I will post a patch to fix the warning, sorry for introducing these things.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
@ 2013-06-06 7:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-06 7:59 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-06-06 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Ming Lei
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
produced this warning:
drivers/base/firmware_class.c:921:13: warning: 'kill_requests_without_uevent' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Introduced by commit ddf1f0648e8c ("firmware loader: fix build failure
with !CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER"). This build does no have
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP defined.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-14 7:22 ` Thomas Renninger
@ 2010-09-14 13:28 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-09-14 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Renninger
Cc: Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:22:51AM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Monday 13 September 2010 22:57:12 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > > > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > > > > > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > > > > > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > > > > > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> > > > > then, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas, care to fix this up?
> > > >
> > > > ping. Is Thomas around??
> > > Yep, sorry for not responding.
> > >
> > > I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
> > > warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
> > > old patch.
> > >
> > > I have another solution for that, please drop above patch.
> > > Jason pointed out that kernel boot params for compiled-in modules are
> > > not recognized correctly. I fiddled with that for quite some time last week...
> > >
> > > I should be able to send something tomorrow.
> > > I will include lkml as it touches several files, would be great if Greg
> > > can pick them up again if feedback is positive.
> >
> > Ok, which exact patch do you want me to drop, the "Introduce global fake
> > module param..." one?
> Yes, please.
Now dropped.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-13 20:57 ` Greg KH
@ 2010-09-14 7:22 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-14 13:28 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2010-09-14 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Monday 13 September 2010 22:57:12 Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > >
> > > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> > > > >
> > > > > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > > > > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> > > > >
> > > > > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > > > > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > > > > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
> > > >
> > > > Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> > > > then, right?
> > > >
> > > > Thomas, care to fix this up?
> > >
> > > ping. Is Thomas around??
> > Yep, sorry for not responding.
> >
> > I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
> > warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
> > old patch.
> >
> > I have another solution for that, please drop above patch.
> > Jason pointed out that kernel boot params for compiled-in modules are
> > not recognized correctly. I fiddled with that for quite some time last week...
> >
> > I should be able to send something tomorrow.
> > I will include lkml as it touches several files, would be great if Greg
> > can pick them up again if feedback is positive.
>
> Ok, which exact patch do you want me to drop, the "Introduce global fake
> module param..." one?
Yes, please.
Thanks,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-14 4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-09-14 5:14 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-09-14 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Thomas Renninger, Greg KH, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
On 09/13/10 21:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:13 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>>>> allnoconfig) produced this warning:
>>>>>
>>>>> kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
>>>>> kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
>>>>>
>>>>> Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
>>>>> Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
>>>>> 1024 byte array to the stack ...
>>>>
>>>> Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
>>>> then, right?
>>>>
>>>> Thomas, care to fix this up?
>>>
>>> ping. Is Thomas around??
>> Yep, sorry for not responding.
>>
>> I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
>> warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
>> old patch.
>
> The report is for a powerpc allnoconfig build (see above) i.e. ppc32.
It also happens on x86_32 (i386).
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-13 19:26 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-13 20:57 ` Greg KH
@ 2010-09-14 4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14 5:14 ` Randy Dunlap
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-14 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Renninger
Cc: Randy Dunlap, Greg KH, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1351 bytes --]
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:13 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> > > >
> > > > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > > > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> > > >
> > > > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > > > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > > > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
> > >
> > > Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> > > then, right?
> > >
> > > Thomas, care to fix this up?
> >
> > ping. Is Thomas around??
> Yep, sorry for not responding.
>
> I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
> warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
> old patch.
The report is for a powerpc allnoconfig build (see above) i.e. ppc32.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-13 19:26 ` Thomas Renninger
@ 2010-09-13 20:57 ` Greg KH
2010-09-14 7:22 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-14 4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-09-13 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Renninger
Cc: Randy Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> > > >
> > > > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > > > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> > > >
> > > > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > > > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > > > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
> > >
> > > Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> > > then, right?
> > >
> > > Thomas, care to fix this up?
> >
> > ping. Is Thomas around??
> Yep, sorry for not responding.
>
> I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
> warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
> old patch.
>
> I have another solution for that, please drop above patch.
> Jason pointed out that kernel boot params for compiled-in modules are
> not recognized correctly. I fiddled with that for quite some time last week...
>
> I should be able to send something tomorrow.
> I will include lkml as it touches several files, would be great if Greg
> can pick them up again if feedback is positive.
Ok, which exact patch do you want me to drop, the "Introduce global fake
module param..." one?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-13 15:51 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2010-09-13 19:26 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-13 20:57 ` Greg KH
2010-09-14 4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2010-09-13 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> > >
> > > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> > >
> > > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
> >
> > Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> > then, right?
> >
> > Thomas, care to fix this up?
>
> ping. Is Thomas around??
Yep, sorry for not responding.
I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
old patch.
I have another solution for that, please drop above patch.
Jason pointed out that kernel boot params for compiled-in modules are
not recognized correctly. I fiddled with that for quite some time last week...
I should be able to send something tomorrow.
I will include lkml as it touches several files, would be great if Greg
can pick them up again if feedback is positive.
Thanks,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-07 2:34 ` Greg KH
2010-09-07 7:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-09-13 15:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-13 19:26 ` Thomas Renninger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-09-13 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Thomas Renninger, Jason Baron, linux-next,
linux-kernel
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> >
> > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
>
> Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> then, right?
>
> Thomas, care to fix this up?
ping. Is Thomas around??
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-07 2:34 ` Greg KH
@ 2010-09-07 7:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 15:51 ` Randy Dunlap
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-07 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Thomas Renninger, Jason Baron, linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 362 bytes --]
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
> then, right?
It may have ... there are lots of warnings and I don't always notice new ones.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
2010-09-07 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-09-07 2:34 ` Greg KH
2010-09-07 7:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 15:51 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-09-07 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Thomas Renninger, Jason Baron; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
>
> Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> 1024 byte array to the stack ...
Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree
then, right?
Thomas, care to fix this up?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
@ 2010-09-07 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-07 2:34 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-07 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Thomas Renninger, Jason Baron
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]
Hi Greg,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) produced this warning:
kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
1024 byte array to the stack ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-20 1:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-19 8:00 linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-19 14:38 ` Greg KH
2013-06-20 1:34 ` Ming Lei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-06 7:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-06 7:59 ` Ming Lei
2010-09-07 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-07 2:34 ` Greg KH
2010-09-07 7:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 15:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-13 19:26 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-13 20:57 ` Greg KH
2010-09-14 7:22 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-09-14 13:28 ` Greg KH
2010-09-14 4:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14 5:14 ` Randy Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).