From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] perf: add timehist command
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:26:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620152640.GC17638@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C318F6.2030301@gmail.com>
* David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/20/13 4:46 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >Looks very useful!
> >
> >This is the kind of analysis I thought 'perf sched' might one day end up
> >doing.
> >
> >Do you plan to submit it non-RFC, to be merged?
>
> Yes. Hopefully I can find time to work on it over the next 2 months
> for 3.12, 3.13 at the latest.
>
> >
> >Your tool could take over the somewhat stale 'perf sched' command as well
> >btw., while possibly carrying over some of the perf sched features like
> >'replay'.
> >
> >'perf sched record' enough events to support the ones you need:
> >
> >>> perf record -e cs -c 1 -ag -- <workload>
> >plus:
> >
> > 'perf sched sum[mary]' # show the summary
> > 'perf sched tree' # could show the tree.
> > 'perf sched hist[ogram]' # would show the histogram
> >
> >i.e. feel free to take over 'perf sched' to suit your 'timehist' workflow
> >and logic. As the main (and somewhat overworked) author of 'perf sched' I
> >have no problem with you taking it over, at all.
>
> It should be part of perf-sched. It is not at the moment for a number of
> (mostly shortcut) reasons. For the next iteration I will look at
> combining it with perf-sched and in the process I will go through the
> existing code for perf-sched.
If it's easier you could start by using your code as the starting point
and add back perf sched features after that. I find your tool
fundamentally more valuable because it's in active use.
> As an FYI I also have a daemon that provides the functionality in a
> flight recorder mode but with data dumped only when requested. Future
> project to integrate that with perf. ;-)
:-)
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 22:22 [RFC PATCH 0/4] perf: timehist command David Ahern
2013-06-07 22:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] perf: move setup_list from symbol.c to strlist.c David Ahern
2013-06-07 22:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] perf: add methods for setting/retrieving priv element of thread struct David Ahern
2013-07-19 7:43 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Add methods for setting/ retrieving " tip-bot for David Ahern
2013-06-07 22:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: sample after exit loses thread correlation David Ahern
2013-06-07 22:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] perf: add timehist command David Ahern
2013-06-20 10:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-20 15:00 ` David Ahern
2013-06-20 15:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620152640.GC17638@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).