linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	walken@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@mit.edu,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/45] smp: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:10:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130623134008.19094.98716.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130623133642.19094.16038.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>

Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.

Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 kernel/smp.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 4dba0f7..1f36d6d 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
 	 * prevent preemption and reschedule on another processor,
 	 * as well as CPU removal
 	 */
-	this_cpu = get_cpu();
+	this_cpu = get_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	/*
 	 * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
 		}
 	}
 
-	put_cpu();
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	int ret;
 
 	/* Try for same CPU (cheapest) */
-	cpu = get_cpu();
+	cpu = get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
 		goto call;
 
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
 call:
 	ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
-	put_cpu();
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
@@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd,
 	unsigned int this_cpu;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	this_cpu = get_cpu();
+	this_cpu = get_online_cpus_atomic();
+
 	/*
 	 * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
 	 * We allow cpu's that are not yet online though, as no one else can
@@ -349,7 +350,8 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *csd,
 		csd_lock(csd);
 		generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, wait);
 	}
-	put_cpu();
+
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -370,7 +372,9 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 			    smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait)
 {
 	struct call_function_data *cfd;
-	int cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	int cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu;
+
+	this_cpu = get_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	/*
 	 * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
@@ -388,7 +392,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 
 	/* No online cpus?  We're done. */
 	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-		return;
+		goto out;
 
 	/* Do we have another CPU which isn't us? */
 	next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -398,7 +402,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	/* Fastpath: do that cpu by itself. */
 	if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
 		smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
-		return;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	cfd = &__get_cpu_var(cfd_data);
@@ -408,7 +412,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 
 	/* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */
 	if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(cfd->cpumask)))
-		return;
+		goto out;
 
 	/*
 	 * After we put an entry into the list, cfd->cpumask may be cleared
@@ -443,6 +447,9 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 			csd_lock_wait(csd);
 		}
 	}
+
+out:
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
 
@@ -463,9 +470,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
  */
 int smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
 {
-	preempt_disable();
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	smp_call_function_many(cpu_online_mask, func, info, wait);
-	preempt_enable();
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -565,12 +572,12 @@ int on_each_cpu(void (*func) (void *info), void *info, int wait)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	preempt_disable();
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	ret = smp_call_function(func, info, wait);
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	func(info);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
-	preempt_enable();
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu);
@@ -592,7 +599,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu);
 void on_each_cpu_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func,
 			void *info, bool wait)
 {
-	int cpu = get_cpu();
+	unsigned int cpu = get_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	smp_call_function_many(mask, func, info, wait);
 	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask)) {
@@ -600,7 +607,7 @@ void on_each_cpu_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func,
 		func(info);
 		local_irq_enable();
 	}
-	put_cpu();
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
 
@@ -625,8 +632,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
  * The function might sleep if the GFP flags indicates a non
  * atomic allocation is allowed.
  *
- * Preemption is disabled to protect against CPUs going offline but not online.
- * CPUs going online during the call will not be seen or sent an IPI.
+ * We use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to protect against CPUs going
+ * offline but not online. CPUs going online during the call will
+ * not be seen or sent an IPI.
  *
  * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
  * from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
@@ -641,26 +649,26 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
 	might_sleep_if(gfp_flags & __GFP_WAIT);
 
 	if (likely(zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, (gfp_flags|__GFP_NOWARN)))) {
-		preempt_disable();
+		get_online_cpus_atomic();
 		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
 			if (cond_func(cpu, info))
 				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
 		on_each_cpu_mask(cpus, func, info, wait);
-		preempt_enable();
+		put_online_cpus_atomic();
 		free_cpumask_var(cpus);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * No free cpumask, bother. No matter, we'll
 		 * just have to IPI them one by one.
 		 */
-		preempt_disable();
+		get_online_cpus_atomic();
 		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
 			if (cond_func(cpu, info)) {
 				ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func,
 								info, wait);
 				WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret);
 			}
-		preempt_enable();
+		put_online_cpus_atomic();
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-23 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-23 13:37 [PATCH 00/45] CPU hotplug: stop_machine()-free CPU hotplug, part 1 Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:38 ` [PATCH 01/45] CPU hotplug: Provide APIs to prevent CPU offline from atomic context Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-24 22:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-23 13:38 ` [PATCH 02/45] CPU hotplug: Clarify the usage of different synchronization APIs Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:38 ` [PATCH 03/45] Documentation, CPU hotplug: Recommend usage of get/put_online_cpus_atomic() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:38 ` [PATCH 04/45] CPU hotplug: Add infrastructure to check lacking hotplug synchronization Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-24 23:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 18:49     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH 05/45] CPU hotplug: Protect set_cpu_online() to avoid false-positives Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH 06/45] CPU hotplug: Sprinkle debugging checks to catch locking bugs Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH 07/45] CPU hotplug: Expose the new debug config option Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 15:08   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-23 18:58     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:39 ` [PATCH 08/45] CPU hotplug: Convert preprocessor macros to static inline functions Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:40 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2013-06-23 13:40 ` [PATCH 10/45] sched/core: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:40 ` [PATCH 11/45] migration: Use raw_spin_lock/unlock since interrupts are already disabled Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:40 ` [PATCH 12/45] sched/fair: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:40 ` [PATCH 13/45] timer: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:41 ` [PATCH 14/45] sched/rt: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:41 ` [PATCH 15/45] rcu: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:41 ` [PATCH 16/45] tick-broadcast: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:41 ` [PATCH 17/45] time/clocksource: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 18/45] softirq: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 19/45] irq: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 20/45] net: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 21/45] block: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 22/45] percpu_counter: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-24 17:55   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-24 18:06     ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-24 18:09       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 23/45] infiniband: ehca: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 24/45] [SCSI] fcoe: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 25/45] staging/octeon: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 18:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-23 18:55     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 19:17       ` Joe Perches
2013-06-24 17:25         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-24 18:17       ` David Daney
2013-06-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 26/45] x86: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 27/45] perf/x86: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:44 ` [PATCH 28/45] KVM: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:44 ` [PATCH 29/45] kvm/vmx: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:44 ` [PATCH 30/45] x86/xen: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:45 ` [PATCH 31/45] alpha/smp: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 17:50   ` Matt Turner
2013-06-23 18:56     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:45 ` [PATCH 32/45] blackfin/smp: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:45 ` [PATCH 33/45] cris/smp: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-24  6:41   ` Jesper Nilsson
2013-06-23 13:45 ` [PATCH 34/45] hexagon/smp: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:45 ` [PATCH 35/45] ia64: irq, perfmon: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:46 ` [PATCH 36/45] ia64: smp, tlb: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:46 ` [PATCH 37/45] m32r: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:46 ` [PATCH 38/45] MIPS: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:46 ` [PATCH 39/45] mn10300: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 40/45] powerpc, irq: Use GFP_ATOMIC allocations in atomic context Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-25  2:08   ` Michael Ellerman
2013-06-25  2:13     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25  2:58       ` Michael Ellerman
2013-06-25  3:13         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-25 19:20           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 41/45] powerpc: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 42/45] powerpc: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to avoid false-positive warning Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:47 ` [PATCH 43/45] sh: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:48 ` [PATCH 44/45] sparc: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-06-23 13:48 ` [PATCH 45/45] tile: " Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130623134008.19094.98716.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=shli@fusionio.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=udknight@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).