From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751367Ab3FXTpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:45:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com ([209.85.215.179]:57639 "EHLO mail-ea0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936Ab3FXTpP (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:45:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:45:11 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Robert Richter , Borislav Petkov , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] perf, persistent: Kernel updates for perf tool integration Message-ID: <20130624194510.GC4065@gmail.com> References: <1370968960-22527-1-git-send-email-rric@kernel.org> <20130624152557.GU28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130624152557.GU28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:42:26PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > > Oh and what Boris and Ingo said; persistent events should 'persist' and > not be tied to particular processes. I'm not sure about the entire > eventfs thing; but the proposed sysfs thing should definitely work for > now. I'm fine with a sysfs approach as well, as long as it's correct and obvious enough to use. Thanks, Ingo