From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752099Ab3FYNdB (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:33:01 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:49960 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830Ab3FYNc6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:32:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:32:45 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Dave Chinner Cc: g@dastard, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] vfs: check for integer overflows in posix_acl_alloc() Message-ID: <20130625133245.GI5714@mwanda> References: <20130624162719.GB32503@elgon.mountain> <20130624213709.GT29338@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130624213709.GT29338@dastard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah. You're right. When I look at it more closely the ext4 example is capped ext4_get_acl(). Sorry for the noise. regards, dan carpenter