linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: slab shrinkers: BUG at mm/list_lru.c:92
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:22:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626082220.GG28748@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130623115127.GA7986@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun 23-06-13 15:51:29, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:00:21AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 20-06-13 17:12:01, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > I am bisecting it again. It is quite tedious, though, because good case
> > > is hard to be sure about.
> > 
> > OK, so now I converged to 2d4fc052 (inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru
> > list code.) in my tree and I have double checked it matches what is in
> > the linux-next. This doesn't help much to pin point the issue I am
> > afraid :/
> > 
> Can you revert this patch (easiest way ATM is to rewind your tree to a point
> right before it) and apply the following patch?

OK, I am testing it now.

> As Dave has mentioned, it is very likely that this bug was already there, we
> were just not ever checking imbalances. The attached patch would tell us at
> least if the imbalance was there before.

Maybe I wasn't clear before but I have seen mostly hangs (posted
earlier) during bisection. I do not remember BUG_ONs on imbalances after
inode_lru_isolate fix.

> If this is the case, I would suggest
> turning the BUG condition into a WARN_ON_ONCE since we would be officially
> not introducing any regression. It is no less of a bug, though, and we should
> keep looking for it.
> 
> The main change from before / after the patch is that we are now keeping things
> per node. One possibility of having this BUGing would be to have an inode to be
> inserted into one node-lru and removed from another. I cannot see how it could
> happen, because kernel pages are stable in memory and are not moved from node
> to node. We could still have some sort of weird bug in the node calculation
> function. 

> In any case, would it be possible for you to artificially restrict
> your setup to a single node ? Although I have no idea how to do that, we seem
> to have no parameter to disable numa. Maybe booting with less memory, enough to
> fit a single node?

I can play with memmap to use areas on from a single node. Let's see
whether the patch in the follow up email shows something first.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-26  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 14:18 linux-next: slab shrinkers: BUG at mm/list_lru.c:92 Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 15:14 ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-17 15:33   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 16:54     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  7:42       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 21:35   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 22:30     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  2:46       ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-18  6:31         ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  8:24           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18 10:44             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18 13:50               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-25  2:27                 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-26  8:15                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26 23:24                     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-27 14:54                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28  8:39                         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 14:31                           ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-28 15:12                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-29  2:55                         ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-30 18:33                           ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-01  1:25                             ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-01  7:50                               ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-01  8:10                                 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02  9:22                                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-02 12:19                                     ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02 12:44                                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-03 11:24                                         ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-03 14:08                                           ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-04 16:36                                           ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-08 12:53                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-08 21:04                                               ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-09 17:34                                                 ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-09 17:51                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-09 17:32                                               ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-09 17:50                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-09 17:57                                                   ` Glauber Costa
2013-07-09 17:57                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-09 21:39                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-10  2:31                                               ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-10  7:34                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-10  8:06                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-11  2:26                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-11  3:03                                                     ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-11 13:23                                                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-12  1:42                                                       ` Hugh Dickins
2013-07-13  3:29                                                         ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-15  9:14                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  6:26       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  8:25         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19  7:13         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19  7:35           ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-19  8:52             ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-19 13:57             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 14:02               ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-19 14:28           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20 14:11             ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-20 15:12               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20 15:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21  9:00                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-23 11:51                   ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-23 11:55                     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-25  2:29                     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-26  8:22                     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-06-18  8:19       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  8:21         ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-18  8:26           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130626082220.GG28748@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).