linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:58:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702052812.GA2654@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130701084321.GD1875@suse.de>

* Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> [2013-07-01 09:43:21]:

> 
> Thanks. Each of the the two runs had 5 iterations and there is a
> difference in the reported average. Do you know what the standard
> deviation is of the results?

Yes, the results were from 2 different runs. 
I hadnt calculated the std deviation for those runs.
> 
> I'm less concerned about the numa01 results as it is an adverse
> workload on machins with more than two sockets but the numa02 results
> are certainly of concern. My own testing for numa02 showed little or no
> change. Would you mind testing with "Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a
> new preferred node is selected" reverted please?
> 

Here are the results with the last patch reverted as requested by you.

KernelVersion: 3.9.0-mainline_v39+ your patches - last patch
		Testcase:      Min      Max      Avg  StdDev  %Change
		  numa01:  1704.50  1841.82  1757.55   49.27    2.42%
     numa01_THREAD_ALLOC:   433.25   517.07   464.17   28.15  -32.99%
		  numa02:    55.64    61.75    57.70    2.19  -43.52%
	      numa02_SMT:    44.78    53.45    48.72    2.91  -18.53%



Detailed run output here 

numa01 1704.50 248.67 71999.86 207091 1093
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC 461.62 416.89 23064.79 90283 961
numa02 61.75 93.86 2444.21 10652 6
numa02_SMT 46.79 23.13 977.94 1925 8
numa01 1769.09 262.00 74607.77 226677 1313
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC 433.25 365.12 21994.25 88597 773
numa02 55.64 89.52 2250.01 8848 210
numa02_SMT 49.39 19.81 938.86 1376 33
numa01 1841.82 407.73 78683.69 227428 1834
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC 517.07 465.71 26152.60 111689 978
numa02 55.95 103.26 2223.36 8471 158
numa02_SMT 53.45 19.73 962.08 1349 26
numa01 1760.41 474.74 76094.03 231278 2802
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC 456.80 395.35 23170.23 88049 835
numa02 57.18 87.31 2390.11 10804 3
numa02_SMT 44.78 26.48 944.28 1314 7
numa01 1711.91 421.49 77728.30 224185 2103
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC 452.09 430.88 22271.38 83418 2035
numa02 57.97 126.86 2354.34 8991 135
numa02_SMT 49.19 34.99 914.35 1308 22


> -- 
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-26 14:37 [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 15:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:22     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:08   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  8:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:30     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  8:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:24       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 12:33     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-27 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:00     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:01     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:45     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28  8:11   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:51         ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:14           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 17:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:44               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 12:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02 16:29     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 18:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-06  6:44       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-06 10:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02 18:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03  9:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 15:28       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:00     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  7:00   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:12       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:29           ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01  5:39   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01  8:43     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02  5:28       ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-07-02  7:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130702052812.GA2654@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).