From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752298Ab3GHQrf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:47:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ye0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]:57642 "EHLO mail-ye0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751488Ab3GHQre (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:47:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:47:26 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Greg Price , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf report/top: Add option to collapse undesired parts of call graph Message-ID: <20130708164726.GB3028@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20130701142841.GE22203@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu> <20130707131340.GA23433@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20130708115746.GO22203@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu> <20130708162452.GB2957@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130708162452.GB2957@krava.brq.redhat.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 06:24:52PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Greg Price wrote: > > For example, in an application with an expensive function > > implemented with deeply nested recursive calls, the default > > call-graph presentation is dominated by the different callchains > > within that function. By ignoring these callees, we can collect the > > callchains leading into the function and compactly identify what to > > blame for expensive calls. > change looks ok, but I'm not that confident in this part, so at least: > Tested-by: Jiri Olsa Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo