Hi Sedat, On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:43:59 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > > The refreshed patch is from 02-Aug-2013. > So why did next-20130805 and next-20130806 did not have it? > I was reading for these Linux-next releases the same: "I have used the > ext4 tree from next-20130726 for today.". > I am wondering what went wrong. Ted did not update the branch of his tree that is included in linux-next until now. Presumably he was doing some testing - there were other changes in it as well. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au