linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:56:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130905185649.0dce2b5824f7a3fb355234c2@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
include/linux/fs.h between commit 7b7a8665edd8 ("direct-io: Implement
generic deferred AIO completions") from the vfs tree and commit "dcache:
convert to use new lru list infrastructure" from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc include/linux/fs.h
index ee1a9b2,b778968..0000000

--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@@ -1421,8 -1413,12 +1413,15 @@@ struct super_block 
  	/* Being remounted read-only */
  	int s_readonly_remount;
  
 +	/* AIO completions deferred from interrupt context */
 +	struct workqueue_struct *s_dio_done_wq;
++
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Keep the lru lists last in the structure so they always sit on their
+ 	 * own individual cachelines.
+ 	 */
+ 	struct list_lru		s_dentry_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+ 	struct list_lru		s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
  };
  
  extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
