linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@infradead.org
Subject: Re: x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:14:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131015101404.GD10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131014203549.GY227855@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:

> This gave more stable numbers such that I could now narrow things down.
> While there are a few places that are causing latencies, for now I focused on
> the longest one first.  It seems to be 'copy_user_from_nmi'
> 
> intel_pmu_handle_irq ->
> 	intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm ->
> 		__intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm ->
> 			__intel_pmu_pebs_event ->
> 				intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip ->
> 					copy_from_user_nmi
> 
> In intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(), if the while-loop goes over 50, the sum of
> all the copy_from_user_nmi latencies seems to go over 1,000,000 cycles
> (there are some cases where only 10 iterations are needed to go that high
> too, but in generall over 50 or so).  At this point copy_user_from_nmi
> seems to account for over 90% of the nmi latency.

What does the below do? It appears the perf userspace lost the ability
to display the MISC_EXACT_IP percentage so I've no clue if it actually
works or not.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 32e9ed81cd00..3978e72a1c9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -722,6 +722,8 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_disable_all(void)
 		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, 0);
 }
 
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8 [PAGE_SIZE], insn_page);
+
 static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
@@ -729,6 +731,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	unsigned long old_to, to = cpuc->lbr_entries[0].to;
 	unsigned long ip = regs->ip;
 	int is_64bit = 0;
+	int size, bytes;
+	void *kaddr;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't need to fixup if the PEBS assist is fault like
@@ -763,29 +767,44 @@ static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return 1;
 	}
 
+refill:
+	if (kernel_ip(ip)) {
+		u8 *buf = &__get_cpu_var(insn_page[0]);
+		size = PAGE_SIZE - ((unsigned long)to & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
+		if (size < MAX_INSN_SIZE) {
+			/*
+			 * If we're going to have to touch two pages; just copy
+			 * as much as we can hold.
+			 */
+			size = PAGE_SIZE;
+		}
+		bytes = copy_from_user_nmi(buf, (void __user *)to, size);
+		if (bytes != size)
+			return 0;
+
+		kaddr = buf;
+	} else {
+		size = INT_MAX;
+		kaddr = (void *)to;
+	}
+
 	do {
 		struct insn insn;
-		u8 buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
-		void *kaddr;
-
-		old_to = to;
-		if (!kernel_ip(ip)) {
-			int bytes, size = MAX_INSN_SIZE;
 
-			bytes = copy_from_user_nmi(buf, (void __user *)to, size);
-			if (bytes != size)
-				return 0;
+		if (size < MAX_INSN_SIZE)
+			goto refill;
 
-			kaddr = buf;
-		} else
-			kaddr = (void *)to;
+		old_to = to;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 		is_64bit = kernel_ip(to) || !test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32);
 #endif
 		insn_init(&insn, kaddr, is_64bit);
 		insn_get_length(&insn);
+
 		to += insn.length;
+		kaddr += insn.length;
+		size -= insn.length;
 	} while (to < ip);
 
 	if (to == ip) {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-15 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-14 20:35 x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-14 21:28 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-15 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-15 13:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 14:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:41         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 10:57           ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 12:46             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 13:31               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 13:54                 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 11:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 13:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-29 14:07                   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Fix NMI measurements tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:52             ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Andi Kleen
2013-10-16 21:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 23:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17  9:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:00                     ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:04                       ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:30                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 18:26                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-17 21:08                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 21:11                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:01                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:27                               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-22 21:12                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23  7:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-23 20:48                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 10:52                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 13:47                                         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-24 14:06                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-25 16:33                                         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-25 17:03                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-26 10:36                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 13:19                                             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-29 14:08                                         ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Further optimize copy_from_user_nmi() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23  7:44                                   ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Ingo Molnar
2013-10-17 14:49             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 14:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:03                 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 15:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:50             ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 16:22         ` x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:36     ` Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:39       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131015101404.GD10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).