From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759474Ab3JOQDf (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:03:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:38214 "EHLO mail-ee0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759303Ab3JOQDd (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:03:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:03:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kees Cook Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , Michael Davidson , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, relocs: Add more per-cpu gold special cases Message-ID: <20131015160329.GA16003@gmail.com> References: <20131011013954.GA28902@www.outflux.net> <20131014083035.GA20976@gmail.com> <007cdb12-9fc7-4744-8686-695891b926a3@email.android.com> <525C1BC1.6090501@zytor.com> <20131015060425.GB3866@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Kees Cook wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> > On 10/14/2013 07:19 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> >> My guess is that the 95 addresses are randomized and the 82 address is an address which failed to relocate. > >> > > >> >> ffffffff82a04a58 is: > >> >> ffffffff82a03000 t init_per_cpu__gdt_page > >> > > >> > > >> > Specifically, it looks like the percpu stuff isn't getting set up correctly. > >> > >> It wouldn't surprise me if there are even more percpu things to fix. > >> It's the main area we've continued to trip over while working on this > >> with various linkers. Which linker and version are you seeing this > >> with? > > > > The failure I saw triggered with fairly modern userspace: > > > > GNU ld version 2.23.52.0.1-9.fc19 20130226 > > > > gcc version 4.8.1 20130603 (Red Hat 4.8.1-1) (GCC) > > Can you try with the gold linker? When not using Gold, I can produce a > similar crash with GNU ld ver 2.23.2 but not 2.22. I'm not set up for Gold - but maybe others can try your experiment. If you can see/reproduce the 2.23 crash then maybe that fix will work for my testcase as well. Thanks, Ingo