From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755243Ab3JYB2n (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:28:43 -0400 Received: from [216.32.181.183] ([216.32.181.183]:55494 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753807Ab3JYB2m (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:28:42 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VS-4(zz98dI9371I936eI1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hz8dhz1de098h8275bh1de097hz2dh87h2a8h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h209eh1151h1155h) X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:27:28 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Rostislav Lisovy CC: Matt Sealey , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sascha Hauer , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: i.MX53: dts for Voipac x53-dmm-668 module Message-ID: <20131025012725.GG14529@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1382461643-16790-1-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <1382461643-16790-4-git-send-email-lisovy@gmail.com> <20131023072738.GI2839@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <1382641926.16515.2.camel@lolumad> <1382644733.19373.2.camel@lolumad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1382644733.19373.2.camel@lolumad> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: sigmatel.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:58:53PM +0200, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > I saw that most of the vendor prefixes are somehow shortened (e.g. > Freescale -- fsl, etc.). The 'fsl' is the stock symbol of Freescale. If that's not the case for voipac, I think 'voipac' is more appropriate. Shawn > On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 14:49 -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > > > Dear Shawn; > > > Thank you for your comments. > > > Should I also add Voipac to > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt? > > > > I would agree with that, but why is your chosen prefix "vp" instead of > > "voipac" anyway? > > > >