From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752120Ab3KGBCa (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:02:30 -0500
Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.226]:14470 "EHLO
	cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232Ab3KGBC1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:02:27 -0500
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:02:00 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] static_key: WARN on usage before
 jump_label_init was called
Message-ID: <20131106200200.7847535d@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20131107005027.GC8144@order.stressinduktion.org>
References: <1382212139-20301-1-git-send-email-hannes@stressinduktion.org>
	<1382212139-20301-4-git-send-email-hannes@stressinduktion.org>
	<20131106161649.2bb1dbb0@gandalf.local.home>
	<20131107005027.GC8144@order.stressinduktion.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 01:50:27 +0100
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Sorry for the late reply, but this was sent while I was getting ready
> > for my two week conference trip.
> > 
> > Note, this should not go through the net tree, but instead should go
> > through tip, as it deals with jump labels and not networking.
> > 
> > Otherwise, this patch looks good.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> 
> The patch already got queued up in net-next. Is this ok or what do you
> suggest to resolve this?
> 

I'm fine, but really. Changes need to go through the trees they are
maintained by. Would Dave Miller like it if I pushed patches that
touched the net directory without a single Ack?

-- Steve