From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753648Ab3KGJJB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:09:01 -0500
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:44320 "EHLO
	mail-ee0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751540Ab3KGJIs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:08:48 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:08:44 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] static_key: WARN on usage before
 jump_label_init was called
Message-ID: <20131107090844.GA719@gmail.com>
References: <1382212139-20301-1-git-send-email-hannes@stressinduktion.org>
 <1382212139-20301-4-git-send-email-hannes@stressinduktion.org>
 <20131106161649.2bb1dbb0@gandalf.local.home>
 <20131107005027.GC8144@order.stressinduktion.org>
 <20131106200200.7847535d@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131106200200.7847535d@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 01:50:27 +0100
> Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Sorry for the late reply, but this was sent while I was getting ready
> > > for my two week conference trip.
> > > 
> > > Note, this should not go through the net tree, but instead should go
> > > through tip, as it deals with jump labels and not networking.
> > > 
> > > Otherwise, this patch looks good.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > 
> > Thanks for the review!
> > 
> > The patch already got queued up in net-next. Is this ok or what do you
> > suggest to resolve this?
> > 
> 
> I'm fine, but really. Changes need to go through the trees they are 
> maintained by. Would Dave Miller like it if I pushed patches that 
> touched the net directory without a single Ack?

I second that concern.

Thanks,

	Ingo