linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: ux500: Remove ATAG support for SDI (MMC)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:26:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131108092651.GT30901@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYuBL58Pj8EZmVGGxXk8mrOY=YkVwWC1Ho7SH01442z0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 08 Nov 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> >> > -struct mmci_platform_data mop500_sdi0_data = {
> >> > -       .f_max          = 100000000,
> >> > -       .capabilities   = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA |
> >> > -                               MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
> >> > -                               MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED |
> >> > -                               MMC_CAP_ERASE |
> >> > -                               MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12 |
> >> > -                               MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25,
> >>
> >> I guess all the above caps is having binders in DT then?
> >
> > They're not there yet, no. But this stuff is not used anymore in
> > Mainline hence the patch. I attempted to supply bindings for them, but
> > they were rejected. Would you like to have a stab at that?
> 
> Yeah but we basically regressed the ux500 with the patch now
> queued for v3.13:
> commit 49c129519a7a8840767321c38d2eaf84a263529b
> "ARM: ux500: Stop passing MMC's platform data for Device Tree boots"
> 
> Which deleted the passing of this non-yet-DT:ed platform
> data.
> 
> Since it's a regression we need to do a fixup patch for the
> v3.13 series adding it back.

Okay, do you want me to do that?

> Since this patch probably needs to be rewritten on top of
> that I don't merge this patch as of now.

Sure.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-08  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-06 10:05 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: ux500: More DT only clean-ups for the platform Lee Jones
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: ux500: Remove legacy ATAG SSP support Lee Jones
2013-11-06 11:58   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-07 11:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-07 11:52     ` Lee Jones
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: ux500: Consolidate [A|D]8500 platform data Lee Jones
2013-11-06 12:01   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 12:04     ` Lee Jones
     [not found]     ` <201311071253281097419@gmail.com>
2013-11-07  9:41       ` PINCTRL:We May need mutex protect in pinctrl API Linus Walleij
     [not found]         ` <201311071748050629542@gmail.com>
2013-11-18 13:22           ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: ux500: Remove ATAG support for SDI (MMC) Lee Jones
2013-11-07 11:40   ` Ulf Hansson
2013-11-07 12:07     ` Lee Jones
2013-11-08  9:06       ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-08  9:26         ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-11-08  9:45           ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-07 11:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-07 11:54     ` Lee Jones
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: ux500: Clean-up non-DT IRQ initialisation Lee Jones
2013-11-19 20:45   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: ux500: Remove unused call to register AMBA devices Lee Jones
2013-11-19 20:54   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: ux500: Clean-up legacy extern prototype Lee Jones
2013-11-19 20:56   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 10:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: ux500: Remove checking for DT during timer init as we are now DT only Lee Jones
2013-11-19 20:58   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131108092651.GT30901@lee--X1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).