From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757518Ab3KMCkI (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:40:08 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34106 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755254Ab3KMCkD (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:40:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:42:52 +0900 From: Greg KH To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , Nitin Gupta , Seth Jennings , lliubbo@gmail.com, jmarchan@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel , Luigi Semenzato Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: zsmalloc: Ensure handle is never 0 on success Message-ID: <20131113024252.GA1023@kroah.com> References: <20131107070451.GA10645@bbox> <20131112154137.GA3330@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131112154137.GA3330@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:41:38AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > We spent much time with preventing zram enhance since it have been in staging > and Greg never want to improve without promotion. It's not "improve", it's "Greg does not want you adding new features and functionality while the code is in staging." I want you to spend your time on getting it out of staging first. Now if something needs to be done based on review and comments to the code, then that's fine to do and I'll accept that, but I've been seeing new functionality be added to the code, which I will not accept because it seems that you all have given up on getting it merged, which isn't ok. thanks, greg k-h