linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] x86, apic, kexec, Documentation: Add disable_cpu_apic kernel parameter
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:56:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131202145641.GB18642@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52969DA3.5070000@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:34:27AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
>  int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
>  {
>  	int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
> -	bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(boot_cpu_physical_apicid,
> +	/*
> +	 * boot_cpu_physical_apicid is designed to have the apicid
> +	 * returned by read_apic_id(), i.e, the apicid of the
> +	 * currently booting-up processor. However, on some platforms,
> +	 * it is temporarilly modified by the apicid reported as BSP
> +	 * through MP table. Concretely:
> +	 *
> +	 * - arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c: MP_processor_info()
> +	 * - arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c: amd_numa_init()
> +	 * - arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c: MP_processor_info()
> +	 *
> +	 * This function is executed with the modified
> +	 * boot_cpu_physical_apicid. So, disabled_cpu_apicid kernel
> +	 * parameter doesn't work to disable APs on kdump 2nd kernel.
> +	 *
> +	 * Since fixing handling of boot_cpu_physical_apicid requires
> +	 * another discussion and tests on each platform, we leave it
> +	 * for now and here we use read_apic_id() directly in this
> +	 * function, generic_processor_info().
> +	 */
> +	bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(read_apic_id(),
>  				phys_cpu_present_map);
>  
> +	if (disabled_cpu_apicid != BAD_APICID &&
> +	    disabled_cpu_apicid != read_apic_id() &&
> +	    disabled_cpu_apicid == apicid) {
> +		int thiscpu = num_processors + disabled_cpus;
> +
> +		pr_warning("ACPI: Disabling requested cpu."
> +			   " Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n",
> +			   thiscpu, apicid);
> +
> +		disabled_cpus++;
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If boot cpu has not been detected yet, then only allow upto
>  	 * nr_cpu_ids - 1 processors and keep one slot free for boot cpu
>  	 */
>  	if (!boot_cpu_detected && num_processors >= nr_cpu_ids - 1 &&
> -	    apicid != boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
> +	    apicid != read_apic_id()) {

I thought of using read_apic_id() only for disabled_cpu_apicid case.
Existing code seems to be working fine with boot_cpu_physical_apicid.
Instead of converting rest of the code to read_apic_id() we should fix
notion of boot_cpu_physical_id in a separate cleanup patch series.

IOW, can we please use read_apic_id() only for the case of
disabled_cpu_apicid and leave rest of the code untouched. And handle all
the cleanup in separate patch series.

Thanks
Vivek

      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-02 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-28  1:34 [PATCH v8] x86, apic, kexec, Documentation: Add disable_cpu_apic kernel parameter HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-12-02 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131202145641.GB18642@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).