From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752560Ab3LQXcA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:32:00 -0500
Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.143]:60346 "EHLO
	ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231Ab3LQXb6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:31:58 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMIAJrdsFJ5LHyk/2dsb2JhbABZgwqDPLBwhVCBHhd0giUBAQEEOhwjEAgDGAklDwUlAyETiAPJZRcWjnwHgyOBEwSYFZIVgW2BUiiBLCM
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:52 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Sleep: Freeze filesystems during system
 suspend/hibernation
Message-ID: <20131217233152.GC20579@dastard>
References: <201201281445.49377.rjw@sisk.pl>
 <201202172159.15396.rjw@sisk.pl>
 <CA+5PVA50UA1oP1jKgnQjHh8APp=cNWREw3bkfrkV1OW_Tg1g+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <201205252113.50900.rjw@sisk.pl>
 <CA+5PVA5GWsTdNky-K1-hu5_R55hdKfr-Oa26HpX=FdA1cRZsbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+5PVA7vsZPd9eXwN-Q+d8c9+0bAmVdr698vv+LFyrn+3iFOMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131217230843.GA2911@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131217230843.GA2911@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:08:43AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > >>> Did this patch ever wind up going anywhere?  Fedora has it sitting in
> > >>> our tree with a comment that says "rebase" and I don't see it in the
> > >>> linux-next tree at all.
> > >>>
> > >>> Did if fall through the cracks or was it NAKed somewhere?
> > >>
> > >> No, it wasn't in principle. There were some comments I haven't addressed yet.
> > >
> > > Dredging up a really old thread, sorry.
> > >
> > > We're still carrying this patch along in Fedora.  Should we drop it at
> > > this point, or is it still eventually going to head upstream?
> 
> I'd say drop.

I disagree - given the problem it is resolving leads to silent
filesystem corruption, this patch should be considered somewhat of a
priority to push...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com