From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752089AbaAWM2B (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:28:01 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:58539 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751669AbaAWM17 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:27:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:25:19 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Michal Simek Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Florian Fainelli , Russell King , Christian Daudt , Stephen Boyd , Michal Simek , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Marc C , Matt Porter , David Brown , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Message-ID: <20140123122519.GI17314@sirena.org.uk> References: <1389743333-16741-1-git-send-email-marc.ceeeee@gmail.com> <201401161219.01038.arnd@arndb.de> <20140116134732.GB17314@sirena.org.uk> <201401171804.30572.arnd@arndb.de> <52E0D9AD.1040409@monstr.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nKzfxXxTXZ/rSi7L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52E0D9AD.1040409@monstr.eu> X-Cookie: We have DIFFERENT amounts of HAIR -- User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: brcmstb: dts: add a reference DTS for Broadcom 7445 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nKzfxXxTXZ/rSi7L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > On 01/17/2014 06:04 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> I thought the solution with deferring registration of the resource for > >> dev_get_regmap() until a proper device materialised seemed simple and > >> enough, did you folks run into any problems with that? I had assumed a > >> patch was likely to materialise so wasn't worrying about it myself. > > I'm still hoping that Michal will do that patch. > And what was the resolution/recommendation how to do it? Split the regmap creation so the managed resource registration could be done later on with an already allocated regmap instead of requiring it to be done at creation time. --nKzfxXxTXZ/rSi7L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS4QosAAoJELSic+t+oim9IRcP/RcjGAsMw6AO4bwnobfriOfK xb5wIBfEqOzluTw30In/ZnbAeC3K5Ul0nempH/U+RxD7xyVnNlZO+UUINEWN5ItE JsSGEmn7e0JG//41R1AzgxbsbNGNYfpRpb2xlYhWLS6OatMg8w8kUV2c55r36Siz evsaTwVLtthtKqAe+dB/67gtMzAZ2ZmzTShifIRankVekdS47bRDIkeYDzM51rKG vYRub5hVHZpCPAvAQdtJLXRTZYAr1QCLklSt8UI4ljoU6UrsKaUBBhdJ+LdKOLEO zPSYgtJv+r6uyO6SRIj4qCCYy9mhkYkNzWRjII1Spsajec+aauFTPu8vaB6xo6Sm RkgkxzbR27lwNH9vXIj6KuFlFfcEX8kgby+RqbIL9vEFOEy8wuOPGYUtSRJskTSq gdMigTu28aMrfFt+xQkwQiuy8AD7/I/sVo4JtWj4w2bYce5D+hfaSLJZ2oevQgRV geAVvBbka1B7+zM6yMTrEP4VO+vQHi1nEzy71XnyYyeL8mVcR/RauotNP9j2dcyt spIn4+xOaCCOPi4MQgMZM12Tmb+R6XUppqzpYJ3D0eMk1bhU+CrBLc4NhJoyMW7p ESmev1tmVjQL20iICF7PZ7fwOlYZUNzvhbKl6ad18HrFUnQoLTZHlo8fB02Z15MD 2LDhhY+BvIZ6aR8FVUD2 =Xx7b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nKzfxXxTXZ/rSi7L--