linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology
@ 2014-01-30 20:44 Thomas Glanzmann
  2014-01-31  1:37 ` [ovs-discuss] " Jesse Gross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Glanzmann @ 2014-01-30 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: discuss, LKML

Hello,
open vswitch git head with Linus tip OOPses for me reproducable when I
load the following mininet topology:

(lenovo) [~/work/linux-2.6] git log | head -1
commit 9b0cd304f26b9fca140de15deeac2bf357d1f388
(lenovo) [~/work/openvswitch] git log | head -1
commit 0a8763fcb31bfca0d8d854c235c531005088fcb9

Howto reproduce:
cat > mininet_sample_topo.py <<EOF
from mininet.topo import Topo

class SampleTopo( Topo ):
    "Simple topology"

    def __init__( self ):
        "Create custom topo."

        # Initialize topology
        Topo.__init__( self )

        # Add hosts
        h1= self.addHost( 'h1' )
        h2= self.addHost( 'h2' )
        h3= self.addHost( 'h3' )
        h4= self.addHost( 'h4' )
        h5= self.addHost( 'h5' )
        h6= self.addHost( 'h6' )
        h7= self.addHost( 'h7' )
        h8= self.addHost( 'h8' )
        h9= self.addHost( 'h9' )

        # Switches
        s1= self.addSwitch( 's1' )
        s2= self.addSwitch( 's2' )
        s3= self.addSwitch( 's3' )
        s4= self.addSwitch( 's4' )

        # Add links
        self.addLink( s1, h1 )
        self.addLink( s1, h2 )
        self.addLink( s3, s4 )

        self.addLink( h3, s2 )
        self.addLink( h4, s2 )

        self.addLink( h5, s3 )
        self.addLink( h6, s3 )

        self.addLink( s1, s2 )
        self.addLink( s1, s3 )
        self.addLink( s2, s4 )

        self.addLink( s4, h7 )
        self.addLink( s4, h8 )
        self.addLink( s4, h9 )

topos = { 'sampletopo': ( lambda: SampleTopo() ) }
EOF

mn -v debug --custom mininet_sample_topo.py --topo sampletopo --mac --switch ovsk --arp --controller remote,ip=localhost
Output:
http://pbot.rmdir.de/ptk5-vuy16pLBJGdDSE5JQ

Complete DMESG:
http://pbot.rmdir.de/fD65sAlc49BT-KC5SFRO4g

Kernel Config:
http://pbot.rmdir.de/lEDS-D8yloQbp8TIpGRoIA

[   38.389203] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000a8
[   38.389320] IP: [<ffffffff812ddb76>] if_nlmsg_size+0x144/0x1bc
[   38.389405] PGD b5e35067 PUD b5457067 PMD 0
[   38.389471] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[   38.389521] Modules linked in: veth xt_tcpudp iptable_mangle xt_mark ip_tables x_tables openvswitch gre libcrc32c autofs4 deflate ctr twofish_generic twofish_x86_64_3way xts twofish_x86_64 twofish_common camellia_generic serpent_generic blowfish_generic blowfish_x86_64 blowfish_common cast5_generic cast_common des_generic cbc cmac xcbc rmd160 sha512_generic sha256_generic hmac crypto_null af_key xfrm_algo nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc fuse loop qcserial usb_wwan usbserial btusb bluetooth 6lowpan_iphc hid_generic usbhid hid snd_usb_audio snd_usbmidi_lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_conexant snd_hda_codec_generic coretemp kvm_intel kvm arc4 crc32c_intel snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss ghash_clmulni_intel thinkpad_acpi nvram snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm iwldvm mac80211 snd_seq_midi aesni_intel snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi aes_x86_64 ablk_helper cryptd lrw tpm_tis iwlwifi gf128mul tpm parport_pc snd_seq mxm_wmi snd_timer cfg80211 wmi acpi_cpufreq battery intel_ips i915 drm_kms_helper drm iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support snd_seq_device ac snd rfkill soundcore glue_helper i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit evdev psmouse i2c_core serio_raw pcspkr lpc_ich video ehci_pci ehci_hcd mfd_core usbcore parport usb_common button processor ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sg sd_mod sr_mod crc_t10dif cdrom crct10dif_common ahci libahci libata thermal thermal_sys microcode sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core scsi_mod e1000e ptp pps_core
[   38.391442] CPU: 0 PID: 5058 Comm: ovs-vswitchd Not tainted 3.13.0+ #56
[   38.391508] Hardware name: LENOVO 2912W1C/2912W1C, BIOS 6UET70WW (1.50 ) 10/11/2012
[   38.391610] task: ffff880132a96de0 ti: ffff8800b504e000 task.ti: ffff8800b504e000
[   38.391694] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812ddb76>]  [<ffffffff812ddb76>] if_nlmsg_size+0x144/0x1bc
[   38.391802] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b504f898  EFLAGS: 00210286
[   38.391871] RAX: ffff8800b4da3000 RBX: ffff880036d1a000 RCX: 0000000000000014
[   38.391957] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff880036d1a000
[   38.392052] RBP: 0000000000000014 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff8167c010
[   38.392139] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[   38.392235] R13: ffffffffa080b000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000007
[   38.392327] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880137c00000(0063) knlGS:00000000f7318ac0
[   38.392417] CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
[   38.392474] CR2: 00000000000000a8 CR3: 00000000b50af000 CR4: 00000000000007f0
[   38.392542] Stack:
[   38.392564]  ffff880132f86538 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff
[   38.392646]  ffff880036d1a000 ffffffff8167a580 00000000000000d0 0000000000000010
[   38.392728]  ffffffffa07e5201 ffffffff812e0220 ffff8800b4da3000 ffff880036d1a000
[   38.392810] Call Trace:
[   38.392842]  [<ffffffff812e0220>] ? rtmsg_ifinfo+0x2a/0xd6
[   38.392898]  [<ffffffff812e02f9>] ? rtnetlink_event+0x2d/0x31
[   38.392957]  [<ffffffff81390420>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x2e/0x59
[   38.393019]  [<ffffffff812cf254>] ? call_netdevice_notifiers+0xe/0x13
[   38.393084]  [<ffffffff812d48c4>] ? __netdev_upper_dev_link+0x1c8/0x2d3
[   38.393149]  [<ffffffff812cf918>] ? dev_name_hash.isra.63+0x20/0x35
[   38.393215]  [<ffffffffa07e476a>] ? netdev_create+0x94/0x126 [openvswitch]
[   38.393284]  [<ffffffffa07e3f4b>] ? ovs_vport_add+0x18/0x6d [openvswitch]
[   38.393352]  [<ffffffffa07ddcbc>] ? new_vport+0x9/0x43 [openvswitch]
[   38.393417]  [<ffffffffa07dfba2>] ? ovs_vport_cmd_new+0x102/0x167 [openvswitch]
[   38.393490]  [<ffffffff812f68fa>] ? genl_family_rcv_msg+0x235/0x2a2
[   38.393552]  [<ffffffff812f699f>] ? genl_rcv_msg+0x38/0x5b
[   38.393608]  [<ffffffff812c6cc4>] ? __kmalloc_reserve.isra.42+0x2a/0x6d
[   38.393673]  [<ffffffff812f6967>] ? genl_family_rcv_msg+0x2a2/0x2a2
[   38.393736]  [<ffffffff812f57fb>] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x36/0x7c
[   38.393793]  [<ffffffff812f59c6>] ? genl_rcv+0x1f/0x2c
[   38.393844]  [<ffffffff812f52bf>] ? netlink_unicast+0xff/0x17f
[   38.393903]  [<ffffffff812f5623>] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x2e4/0x312
[   38.393963]  [<ffffffff812c0a5b>] ? sock_sendmsg+0x49/0x64
[   38.394018]  [<ffffffff812d61e0>] ? ethtool_get_value+0x32/0x4a
[   38.394077]  [<ffffffff812d7831>] ? dev_ethtool+0xcdd/0x14c4
[   38.394135]  [<ffffffff811153d5>] ? full_name_hash+0x13/0x50
[   38.394192]  [<ffffffff811153d5>] ? full_name_hash+0x13/0x50
[   38.394249]  [<ffffffff812eaec3>] ? verify_compat_iovec+0x68/0xb1
[   38.394309]  [<ffffffff812c0c56>] ? ___sys_sendmsg+0x1e0/0x25a
[   38.397548]  [<ffffffff812e2d70>] ? dev_ioctl+0x45d/0x5a9
[   38.400743]  [<ffffffff810676d9>] ? __wake_up+0x35/0x46
[   38.403927]  [<ffffffff812bf520>] ? compat_sock_ioctl+0x53d/0xa53
[   38.407127]  [<ffffffff812bfc83>] ? move_addr_to_user+0x5f/0x90
[   38.410238]  [<ffffffff8110f1b0>] ? fput+0xd/0x82
[   38.413228]  [<ffffffff812c15da>] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x39/0x57
[   38.416123]  [<ffffffff812eb8e0>] ? compat_sys_socketcall+0x145/0x19d
[   38.418933]  [<ffffffff81393bb5>] ? sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x1a
[   38.421625] Code: 45 68 48 85 c0 74 10 48 89 df ff d0 83 c0 07 83 e0 fc 48 98 48 01 c5 48 89 df e8 0d 13 ff ff 48 85 c0 74 21 48 8b 90 08 07 00 00 <48> 8b 92 a8 00 00 00 48 85 d2 74 0e 48 89 de 48 89 c7 ff d2 48
[   38.427445] RIP  [<ffffffff812ddb76>] if_nlmsg_size+0x144/0x1bc
[   38.430162]  RSP <ffff8800b504f898>
[   38.432962] CR2: 00000000000000a8
[   38.456280] ---[ end trace 6e07d7de8b97f35f ]---

Cheers,
        Thomas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [ovs-discuss] Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology
  2014-01-30 20:44 Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology Thomas Glanzmann
@ 2014-01-31  1:37 ` Jesse Gross
  2014-01-31  2:33   ` Thomas Glanzmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Gross @ 2014-01-31  1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Glanzmann, discuss, LKML

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de> wrote:
> Hello,
> open vswitch git head with Linus tip OOPses for me reproducable when I
> load the following mininet topology:

This looks like the kernel module included with upstream Linux instead
of from OVS git, is that correct?

Can you please describe what you are doing instead of just giving your script?

It would also be helpful if you could use GDB to find out the source
of the faulting address.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [ovs-discuss] Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology
  2014-01-31  1:37 ` [ovs-discuss] " Jesse Gross
@ 2014-01-31  2:33   ` Thomas Glanzmann
  2014-01-31 18:07     ` Jesse Gross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Glanzmann @ 2014-01-31  2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jesse Gross; +Cc: discuss, LKML

Hello Jesse,

> This looks like the kernel module included with upstream Linux instead
> of from OVS git, is that correct?

coorect.

> Can you please describe what you are doing instead of just giving your script?

I created 8 hosts. 2 hosts are connected two each switches. That gives
me 4 switches which are connected using a ring topology. The reason for
that is that I want to test the Layer2, Layer3 IPv4 and IPv6
capabilities of OpenDayLight.

Cheers,
        Thomas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [ovs-discuss] Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology
  2014-01-31  2:33   ` Thomas Glanzmann
@ 2014-01-31 18:07     ` Jesse Gross
  2014-01-31 18:18       ` Thomas Glanzmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Gross @ 2014-01-31 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Glanzmann, Jesse Gross, discuss, LKML

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de> wrote:
> Hello Jesse,
>
>> This looks like the kernel module included with upstream Linux instead
>> of from OVS git, is that correct?
>
> coorect.
>
>> Can you please describe what you are doing instead of just giving your script?
>
> I created 8 hosts. 2 hosts are connected two each switches. That gives
> me 4 switches which are connected using a ring topology. The reason for
> that is that I want to test the Layer2, Layer3 IPv4 and IPv6
> capabilities of OpenDayLight.

Do you know what type of devices are being attached to OVS (i.e. tap,
veth, etc.)?

Do you know if this happens with an older kernel or with a simpler topology?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [ovs-discuss] Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology
  2014-01-31 18:07     ` Jesse Gross
@ 2014-01-31 18:18       ` Thomas Glanzmann
  2014-02-04  2:48         ` Jesse Gross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Glanzmann @ 2014-01-31 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jesse Gross; +Cc: discuss, LKML

Hello Jesse,

> Do you know what type of devices are being attached to OVS (i.e. tap,
> veth, etc.)?

my e-mail has a link to the debug log which contains that Information.
But from my understanding there are several tap devices: one per host,
4-5 per switch. Tap because it needs layer 2.

There are the last commands that are issued before it crashes:

*** Starting controller
*** Starting 4 switches
s1 *** s1 : ('ifconfig lo up',)
*** s1 : ('ovs-vsctl del-br', <OVSSwitch s1: lo:127.0.0.1,s1-eth1:None,s1-eth2:None,s1-eth3:None,s1-eth4:None pid=6694> )
*** s1 : ('ovs-vsctl add-br', <OVSSwitch s1: lo:127.0.0.1,s1-eth1:None,s1-eth2:None,s1-eth3:None,s1-eth4:None pid=6694> )
*** s1 : ('ovs-vsctl -- set Bridge', <OVSSwitch s1: lo:127.0.0.1,s1-eth1:None,s1-eth2:None,s1-eth3:None,s1-eth4:None pid=6694> , 'other_config:datapath-id=0000000000000001')
*** s1 : ('ovs-vsctl set-fail-mode', <OVSSwitch s1: lo:127.0.0.1,s1-eth1:None,s1-eth2:None,s1-eth3:None,s1-eth4:None pid=6694> , 'secure')
*** s1 : ('ovs-vsctl add-port', <OVSSwitch s1: lo:127.0.0.1,s1-eth1:None,s1-eth2:None,s1-eth3:None,s1-eth4:None pid=6694> , <Intf s1-eth1>)

and than it hangs. I think the last add-port command triggers it.

> Do you know if this happens with an older kernel or with a simpler topology?

No, I don't. I just verified that the Ubuntu Mininet uses the
openvswitch kernel module from openvswitch and not the one that is
shipped with the kernel. Ubuntu precise does not crash with the exact same
topology.

(ubuntu) [~] modinfo openvswitch
filename:
/lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic/updates/dkms/openvswitch.ko
license:        GPL
description:    Open vSwitch switching datapath
srcversion:     7CBEB285B79D96D51E0C633
depends:
vermagic:       3.2.0-58-generic SMP mod_unload modversions

Cheers,
        Thomas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [ovs-discuss] Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology
  2014-01-31 18:18       ` Thomas Glanzmann
@ 2014-02-04  2:48         ` Jesse Gross
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Gross @ 2014-02-04  2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Glanzmann, Jesse Gross, discuss, LKML

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de> wrote:
>> Do you know if this happens with an older kernel or with a simpler topology?
>
> No, I don't. I just verified that the Ubuntu Mininet uses the
> openvswitch kernel module from openvswitch and not the one that is
> shipped with the kernel. Ubuntu precise does not crash with the exact same
> topology.

The kernel from Precise doesn't call the function that is triggering
the problem, so it's not too surprising that it doesn't have the same
issue.

It's not clear that this is actually a bug in the OVS code since it
happens in a different function and that function accesses data that
OVS doesn't really touch. Do you know if this happens with the bridge?
Or can you try bisecting? Or use gdb to track down the faulting
address?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-04  2:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-30 20:44 Linus GIT Head OOPs reproducable in open vswitch when running mininet topology Thomas Glanzmann
2014-01-31  1:37 ` [ovs-discuss] " Jesse Gross
2014-01-31  2:33   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2014-01-31 18:07     ` Jesse Gross
2014-01-31 18:18       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2014-02-04  2:48         ` Jesse Gross

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).