From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752865AbaBCKiJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:38:09 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:49083 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751631AbaBCKiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:38:07 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,771,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="475056261" Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:45:11 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Bjorn Helgaas , Aaron Lu , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , Robert Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Consolidation of ACPIPHP with ACPI core device hotplug Message-ID: <20140203104511.GR18029@intel.com> References: <2217793.001RY6hKlo@vostro.rjw.lan> <1693151.2qrLZHyp0o@vostro.rjw.lan> <1519631.YS65c9Af2C@vostro.rjw.lan> <5157096.hCmU2aoKCT@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5157096.hCmU2aoKCT@vostro.rjw.lan> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 06:11:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > As stated in the message at http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=139135963030012&w=4 , > patch [1/6] was actaully wrong and the whole patchset had to be reworked for that > reason. What follows is an entirely new version: > > [1/7] Add a new function to ACPICA allowing a callback to be executed under the > namespace mutex after calling acpi_ns_get_attached_data(). > > [2/7] Use the new ACPICA's function to fix a couple of potential races related > to ACPI notifies. > > [3/7] Same as [2/6] above. > [4/7] Same as [3/6] above, rebased. > [5/7] Same as [4/6] above. > [6/7] Same as [5/6] above. > [7/7] Dispatch ACPI hotplug notifications for "core" devices and PCI from > acpi_bus_notify(). This actually is different from [6/6] above, although > it serves the same purpose. > On Intel NUC and DZ77RE-75K, Tested-by: Mika Westerberg