From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751487AbaDSKl7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2014 06:41:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:39998 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751043AbaDSKl4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2014 06:41:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:41:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: [GIT PULL] perf fixes Message-ID: <20140419104149.GA4224@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus, Please pull the latest perf-urgent-for-linus git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git perf-urgent-for-linus # HEAD: 24223657806a0ebd0ae5c9caaf7b021091889cf2 perf/x86/intel: Use rdmsrl_safe() when initializing RAPL PMU Two kernel side fixes: - an Intel uncore PMU driver potential crash fix - a kprobes/perf-call-graph interaction fix Thanks, Ingo ------------------> Masami Hiramatsu (1): kprobes/x86: Fix page-fault handling logic Venkatesh Srinivas (1): perf/x86/intel: Use rdmsrl_safe() when initializing RAPL PMU arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 12 +++++++++--- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 16 +++++++--------- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c index 4b9a9e9..7c87424 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu) struct rapl_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu); int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu); u64 ms; + u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits; if (pmu) return 0; @@ -542,6 +543,9 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu) if (phys_id < 0) return -1; + if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits)) + return -1; + pmu = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu)); if (!pmu) return -1; @@ -555,8 +559,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu) * * we cache in local PMU instance */ - rdmsrl(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, pmu->hw_unit); - pmu->hw_unit = (pmu->hw_unit >> 8) & 0x1FULL; + pmu->hw_unit = (msr_rapl_power_unit_bits >> 8) & 0x1FULL; pmu->pmu = &rapl_pmu_class; /* @@ -677,7 +680,9 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); + ret = rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); + if (ret) + goto out; rapl_cpu_init(cpu); } @@ -700,6 +705,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval)); +out: cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c index 79a3f96..61b17dc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c @@ -897,9 +897,10 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr) struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running(); struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk(); - switch (kcb->kprobe_status) { - case KPROBE_HIT_SS: - case KPROBE_REENTER: + if (unlikely(regs->ip == (unsigned long)cur->ainsn.insn)) { + /* This must happen on single-stepping */ + WARN_ON(kcb->kprobe_status != KPROBE_HIT_SS && + kcb->kprobe_status != KPROBE_REENTER); /* * We are here because the instruction being single * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current @@ -914,9 +915,8 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr) else reset_current_kprobe(); preempt_enable_no_resched(); - break; - case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE: - case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE: + } else if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE || + kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE) { /* * We increment the nmissed count for accounting, * we can also use npre/npostfault count for accounting @@ -945,10 +945,8 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr) * fixup routine could not handle it, * Let do_page_fault() fix it. */ - break; - default: - break; } + return 0; }