linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 17:42:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140502154217.GW11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405011443410.19874@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6331 bytes --]

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:49:01PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> It is a rance condition of sorts, because it's just a 10us or so 
> interleaving of calls that causes the bug to happen or not.
> 
> In the good trace:
> 
> 	[parent] __perf_event_task_sched_out (and hence perf_swevent_del)
> 	[child]  perf_release
> 
> In the buggy trace:
> 
> 	[child] perf_release
> 	[parent] __perf_event_task_sched_out (perf_swevent_del never happens)
> 

Can you give this a spin?

---
Subject: perf: Fix race in removing an event
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Fri May 2 16:56:01 CEST 2014

When removing a (sibling) event we do:

	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
	perf_group_detach(event);
	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);

	<hole>

	perf_remove_from_context(event);
		raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
		...
		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);

Now, assuming the event is a sibling, it will be 'unreachable' for
things like ctx_sched_out() because that iterates the
groups->siblings, and we just unhooked the sibling.

So, if during <hole> we get ctx_sched_out(), it will miss the event
and not call event_sched_out() on it, leaving it programmed on the
PMU.

The subsequent perf_remove_from_context() call will find the ctx is
inactive and only call list_del_event() to remove the event from all
other lists.

Hereafter we can proceed to free the event; while still programmed!

Close this hole by moving perf_group_detach() inside the same
ctx->lock region(s) perf_remove_from_context() has.

The condition on inherited events only in __perf_event_exit_task() is
likely complete crap because non-inherited events are part of groups
too and we're tearing down just the same. But leave that for another
patch.

Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Much-staring-at-traces-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Much-staring-at-traces-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/events/core.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1444,6 +1444,11 @@ group_sched_out(struct perf_event *group
 		cpuctx->exclusive = 0;
 }
 
+struct remove_event {
+	struct perf_event *event;
+	bool detach_group;
+};
+
 /*
  * Cross CPU call to remove a performance event
  *
@@ -1452,12 +1457,15 @@ group_sched_out(struct perf_event *group
  */
 static int __perf_remove_from_context(void *info)
 {
-	struct perf_event *event = info;
+	struct remove_event *re = info;
+	struct perf_event *event = re->event;
 	struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
 	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
 	event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
+	if (re->detach_group)
+		perf_group_detach(event);
 	list_del_event(event, ctx);
 	if (!ctx->nr_events && cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx) {
 		ctx->is_active = 0;
@@ -1482,10 +1490,14 @@ static int __perf_remove_from_context(vo
  * When called from perf_event_exit_task, it's OK because the
  * context has been detached from its task.
  */
-static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event)
+static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event, bool detach_group)
 {
 	struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
 	struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+	struct remove_event re = {
+		.event = event,
+		.detach_group = detach_group,
+	};
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
 
@@ -1494,12 +1506,12 @@ static void perf_remove_from_context(str
 		 * Per cpu events are removed via an smp call and
 		 * the removal is always successful.
 		 */
-		cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_remove_from_context, event);
+		cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_remove_from_context, &re);
 		return;
 	}
 
 retry:
-	if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_remove_from_context, event))
+	if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_remove_from_context, &re))
 		return;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
@@ -1516,6 +1528,8 @@ static void perf_remove_from_context(str
 	 * Since the task isn't running, its safe to remove the event, us
 	 * holding the ctx->lock ensures the task won't get scheduled in.
 	 */
+	if (detach_group)
+		perf_group_detach(event);
 	list_del_event(event, ctx);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
 }
@@ -3285,10 +3299,7 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
 	 *     to trigger the AB-BA case.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock_nested(&ctx->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
-	perf_group_detach(event);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
-	perf_remove_from_context(event);
+	perf_remove_from_context(event, true);
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
 
 	free_event(event);
@@ -7180,7 +7191,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
 		struct perf_event_context *gctx = group_leader->ctx;
 
 		mutex_lock(&gctx->mutex);
-		perf_remove_from_context(group_leader);
+		perf_remove_from_context(group_leader, false);
 
 		/*
 		 * Removing from the context ends up with disabled
@@ -7190,7 +7201,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
 		perf_event__state_init(group_leader);
 		list_for_each_entry(sibling, &group_leader->sibling_list,
 				    group_entry) {
-			perf_remove_from_context(sibling);
+			perf_remove_from_context(sibling, false);
 			perf_event__state_init(sibling);
 			put_ctx(gctx);
 		}
@@ -7320,7 +7331,7 @@ void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu
 	mutex_lock(&src_ctx->mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &src_ctx->event_list,
 				 event_entry) {
-		perf_remove_from_context(event);
+		perf_remove_from_context(event, false);
 		unaccount_event_cpu(event, src_cpu);
 		put_ctx(src_ctx);
 		list_add(&event->migrate_entry, &events);
@@ -7382,13 +7393,7 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event
 			 struct perf_event_context *child_ctx,
 			 struct task_struct *child)
 {
-	if (child_event->parent) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
-		perf_group_detach(child_event);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
-	}
-
-	perf_remove_from_context(child_event);
+	perf_remove_from_context(child_event, !!child_event->parent);
 
 	/*
 	 * It can happen that the parent exits first, and has events

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-02 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-15 21:37 [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption Vince Weaver
2014-04-15 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-16  3:21   ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-16  4:18     ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-16 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-16 17:30   ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-16 17:43     ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-16 17:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17  9:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-17 11:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17 14:22           ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-17 14:42             ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-17 14:54               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17 15:35                 ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-18 14:45                 ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-18 14:51                   ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-18 15:23                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 16:59                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 17:15                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-23 20:58                         ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-25  2:51                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-28 14:21                             ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-28 19:38                               ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-29  9:46                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 18:21                                   ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-29 19:01                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 20:59                                       ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-30 18:44                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-30 21:08                                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-30 22:51                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-01 10:26                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-01 11:50                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-01 12:35                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-01 13:12                                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-01 13:29                                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-01 13:22                                                 ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-01 14:07                                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-01 14:27                                             ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-01 15:09                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-01 15:50                                                 ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-01 16:31                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-01 17:18                                                     ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-01 18:49                                                       ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-01 21:32                                                         ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-02 11:15                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-02 15:42                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-05-02 16:22                                                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-02 16:22                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-02 16:43                                                               ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-02 17:27                                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-02 17:46                                                                   ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-02 19:12                                                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-02 20:15                                                                       ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-02 20:45                                                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-03  2:32                                                                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-03  3:02                                                                             ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-03  7:33                                                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05  9:31                                                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 16:00                                                                                 ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-05 17:10                                                                                   ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-05 17:14                                                                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 18:47                                                                                       ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-05 19:36                                                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 19:51                                                                                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-06  1:06                                                                                         ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-06 16:57                                                                                           ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-07 16:45                                                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-08 10:40                                                                                       ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Fix perf_event_init_context() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 17:29                                                                                   ` [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption Ingo Molnar
2014-05-06  4:51                                                                                     ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-06 17:06                                                                                       ` Vince Weaver
2014-05-07 19:12                                                                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-07 19:11                                                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-08 10:40                                                                                 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Fix race in removing an event tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-02 17:06                                                           ` [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption Vince Weaver
2014-05-02 17:04                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 19:26                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-29  8:52                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 18:11                                 ` Vince Weaver
2014-04-29 19:21                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-28 17:48                             ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140502154217.GW11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).