From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756032AbaEEUzv (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 16:55:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:37851 "EHLO mail-pd0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755132AbaEEUzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 16:55:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 13:55:54 -0700 From: Olof Johansson To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: Alexandre Belloni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Antoine =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=E9nart?= , Jimmy Xu , Jisheng Zhang , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Select CONFIG_MACH_BERLIN_BG2Q Message-ID: <20140505205554.GA29112@quad.lixom.net> References: <1395430757-8677-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1395430757-8677-2-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <532CB266.6050800@gmail.com> <534D8B25.3070103@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534D8B25.3070103@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:40:21PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 03/21/2014 10:43 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > On 03/21/2014 08:39 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > >> Now that we support Berlin BG2Q, select CONFIG_MACH_BERLIN_BG2Q so > >> that we can > >> boot BG2Q based boards like the BG2Q DMP. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > > Applied to berlin/soc, Thanks! > > After talking to Arnd on IRC, I found out it is not my business > taking patches for multi_v7_defconfig. > > Instead of me taking it, you get my > > Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth > Applied, but next time please send any patch you want us to apply to arm@kernel.org. FWIW, it's usually how I distinguish between things to review if I have time (personal email) and things that will need attention eventually (arm@kernel.org). It also has the benefit of going to all current maintainers of arm-soc without you having to worry about who it is. :) -Olof