From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752948AbaEFSsn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 14:48:43 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:53123 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752389AbaEFSsl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 14:48:41 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,998,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="428424774" Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:48:40 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Cong Wang Cc: Josh Triplett , David Miller , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Network Developers , LKML , tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] net, diet: Make TCP metrics optional Message-ID: <20140506184840.GN19657@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20140506155703.GA20391@cloud> <20140506.115941.428706504757835279.davem@davemloft.net> <20140506164108.GA20536@cloud> <20140506.131643.994244006906866938.davem@davemloft.net> <20140506175547.GE20776@cloud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So why bothers 3.15+ Linux kernel? Why not use an old kernel e.g. 2.4.x? > 2.4.x kernel doesn't have so many new features you want to get rid of here. Nobody wants to be stuck on an ancient kernel forever. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only