From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: minyard@acm.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp on processor start
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:12:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509091245.GN30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399574859-11714-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:47:39PM -0500, minyard@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
>
> If the sched_clock time starts at a large value, the kernel will spin
> in sched_avg_update for a long time while rq->age_stamp catches up
> with rq->clock.
>
> The comment in kernel/sched/clock.c says that there is no strict promise
> that it starts at zero. So initialize rq->age_stamp when a cpu starts up
> to avoid this.
>
> I was seeing long delays on a simulator that didn't start the clock at
> zero. This might also be an issue on reboots on processors that don't
> re-initialize the timer to zero on reset, and when using kexec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 19:50 [PATCH] sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp on processor start minyard
2014-05-08 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-08 18:47 ` Corey Minyard
2014-05-08 18:47 ` minyard
2014-05-09 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-05-19 13:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Initialize rq-> age_stamp " tip-bot for Corey Minyard
2014-05-22 12:28 ` tip-bot for Corey Minyard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-18 0:05 [PATCH] sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp " minyard
2014-03-18 4:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-03-18 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-18 9:25 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140509091245.GN30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).