linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:04:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140515130435.24132d1b@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514200104.670614672@linutronix.de>

On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:03:27 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> In case the dead lock detector is enabled we follow the lock chain to
> the end in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain, even if we could stop earlier
> due to the priority/waiter constellation.

I'm assuming that we want to detect deadlocks for all futex calls
even when CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is set?

In kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h:

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
# include "rtmutex-debug.h"
#else
# include "rtmutex.h"
#endif

In kernel/locking/rtmutex.h:

#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d)             (d)

In kernel/locking/rtmutex.h:

static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
                                                 int detect)
{
        return (waiter != NULL);
}

Shouldn't that be: return detect || waiter != NULL;

?

I know this a separate issue from this patch series, but it's
something that I just noticed.

> 
> But once we are not longer the top priority waiter in a certain step

"we are no longer the top"

> or the task holding the lock has already the same priority then there
> is no point in dequeing and enqueing along the lock chain as there is
> no change at all.
> 
> So stop the queueing at this point.

I'll continue reviewing the patch.

-- Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-15 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-14 20:03 [patch 0/2] rtmutex: Fix the deadlock detector for real Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-14 20:03 ` [patch 1/2] rtmutex: Fix " Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-14 20:03 ` [patch 2/2] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-15  6:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-15 21:49     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-15 17:04   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-05-20  0:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-20  1:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-15 21:39   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140515130435.24132d1b@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).