From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753105AbaEOPUU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 11:20:20 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:60724 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752310AbaEOPUQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 11:20:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:20:11 +0100 From: Javi Merino To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3] tracing: Add __bitmask() macro to trace events to cpumasks and other bitmasks Message-ID: <20140515152011.GA12682@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20140506132238.22e136d1@gandalf.local.home> <484888063.12149.1399403794855.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140506231238.246c7d3e@gandalf.local.home> <20140514142324.GA10024@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140514113623.171f2a39@gandalf.local.home> <20140514155053.GB3052@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140514142500.020e9896@gandalf.local.home> <20140514194241.GA3883@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140515073405.11002d59@gandalf.local.home> <20140515073609.48049fb0@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140515073609.48049fb0@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2014 15:20:22.0724 (UTC) FILETIME=[309C3840:01CF7051] X-MC-Unique: 114051516201401501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:36:09PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2014 07:34:05 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Should work now. Thanks for testing. > > If all goes well, can you please give me your "Tested-by" for both > patches. I've already ran my updated bitmask kernel patch through my > tests (although, there's still no event that uses it). I've tested it on my setup and it works beautifully now. You can add my Tested-by to both the kernel and the trace-cmd patches. I'll include the kernel one together with a patch that uses it as part of our next series, thanks! > I'll push it to my for-next repo. I'll also work on updating > libtraceevent with the trace-cmd patch such that perf gets the benefit > of this new macro as well. Yup, I guess we'll need a new version of trace-cmd to support this when it gets into the kernel. Thanks for the prompt response, Javi