From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932285AbaEPLAV (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 07:00:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:52708 "EHLO mail-ee0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932133AbaEPLAT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 07:00:19 -0400 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] dt: deps: dependency based device creation To: Alexander Holler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Russell King , Jon Loeliger , Rob Herring In-Reply-To: <5373DBCF.1080503@ahsoftware.de> References: <1399913280-6915-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <1399913280-6915-3-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <20140514140534.897F8C4153D@trevor.secretlab.ca> <53738261.4000000@ahsoftware.de> <20140514200645.15984C4095B@trevor.secretlab.ca> <5373DBCF.1080503@ahsoftware.de> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:00:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20140516110008.E2AC9C403C2@trevor.secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2014 23:10:39 +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 14.05.2014 22:06, schrieb Grant Likely: > > On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:49:05 +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > >> Am 14.05.2014 16:05, schrieb Grant Likely: > >>> On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:47:53 +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > > >> Hmm, I don't really care if that will be merged. I have no motivation to > >> fight with Linux kernel maintainers and I don't know if I will spend the > >> necessary time to do so. > > > > The people you need to convince are Rob, Greg, and me, and you've got my > > attention. If I'm convinced, then I can probably convince Greg also. > > You've got an interesting approach, and I hope you won't give up on it. > > Sorry, but that point of the view is already a problem. Why do I have to > convince you people? > > To summarize: > > Linux kernel maintainers > > - don't like code they haven't written theirself, > - don't like code which doesn't look like they have written it theirself, > - don't like ideas they haven't had themself, > - do feel good in their closed group they have formed, I'm sorry that you feel that way and that you don't want to continue with this. Best wishes. g.