linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 03:25:47 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140522031949.947264874@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140522031841.797415507@linutronix.de

[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-clarify-conditional-deadlock-detection.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5808 bytes --]

The conditions under which deadlock detection is conducted are unclear
and undocumented.

Add constants instead of using 0/1 and provide a selection function
which hides the additional debug dependency from the calling code.

Add comments where needed.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/futex.c                  |   13 ++++++++-----
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c        |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.h        |    7 ++++++-
 kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: tip/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
+++ tip/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1619,7 +1619,8 @@ retry_private:
 			this->pi_state = pi_state;
 			ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
 							this->rt_waiter,
-							this->task, 1);
+							this->task,
+							RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
 			if (ret == 1) {
 				/* We got the lock. */
 				requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
@@ -2238,9 +2239,10 @@ retry_private:
 	/*
 	 * Block on the PI mutex:
 	 */
-	if (!trylock)
-		ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, 1);
-	else {
+	if (!trylock) {
+		ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to,
+					  RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+	} else {
 		ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
 		/* Fixup the trylock return value: */
 		ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK;
@@ -2562,7 +2564,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
 		 */
 		WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
 		pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
-		ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter, 1);
+		ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter,
+						 RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
 		debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
 
 		spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -256,6 +256,25 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct
 }
 
 /*
+ * Deadlock detection is conditional:
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
+ * if the detect argument is != 0.
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always
+ * conducted independent of the detect argument.
+ *
+ * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and
+ * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument
+ * and the config settings.
+ */
+static int
+rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, int detect)
+{
+	return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect);
+}
+
+/*
  * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
  */
 int max_lock_depth = 1024;
@@ -289,8 +308,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(st
 	int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
-							 deadlock_detect);
+	detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
+							deadlock_detect);
 
 	/*
 	 * The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of
@@ -569,9 +588,10 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struc
 		if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
 			chain_walk = 1;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
-	}
-	else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock))
+
+	} else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) {
 		chain_walk = 1;
+	}
 
 	if (!chain_walk)
 		return 0;
@@ -674,7 +694,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mute
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
-	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, NULL, current);
+	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock,
+				   NULL, current);
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
 }
@@ -702,7 +723,8 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_stru
 
 	/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
 	get_task_struct(task);
-	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task);
+	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL, NULL,
+				   task);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -928,7 +950,8 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mut
 {
 	might_sleep();
 
-	rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, rt_mutex_slowlock);
+	rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+			  rt_mutex_slowlock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
 
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.h
@@ -22,5 +22,10 @@
 #define debug_rt_mutex_init(m, n)			do { } while (0)
 #define debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(d, a ,l)		do { } while (0)
 #define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w)		do { } while (0)
-#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d)		(d)
 #define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w)			do { } while (0)
+
+static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+						 int detect)
+{
+	return detect == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK;
+}
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -80,6 +80,21 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mut
 }
 
 /*
+ * Constants for rt mutex functions which have a selectable deadlock
+ * detection.
+ *
+ * RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK:	Stops the lock chain walk when there are
+ *				no further PI adjustments to be made.
+ *
+ * RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK:	Invoke deadlock detection with a full
+ *				walk of the lock chain.
+ */
+enum {
+	RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+	RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
+};
+
+/*
  * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
  */
 extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-22  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-22  3:25 [patch 0/6] rtmutex: Repair deadlock detector and cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22  3:25 ` [patch 1/6] rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-27 22:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-28  9:57     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-28 19:28   ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22  3:25 ` [patch 2/6] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-30 21:36   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-22  3:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-05-30 22:08   ` [patch 3/6] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Steven Rostedt
2014-06-21 20:32   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22  3:25 ` [patch 4/6] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-22  7:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 20:28     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31  2:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-22  3:25 ` [patch 5/6] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31  2:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-22  3:25 ` [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection " Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-27 22:49   ` Jason Low
2014-05-28  9:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31  2:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-21 20:33   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140522031949.947264874@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).