From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933402AbaFIKXf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:23:35 -0400
Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:44848 "EHLO
	atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932102AbaFIKXb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:23:31 -0400
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:23:28 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: 3.15-rc: regression in suspend
Message-ID: <20140609102328.GA25332@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
References: <20140513163734.GA4602@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
 <20140513214155.GA5087@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
 <alpine.LRH.2.00.1405141435510.30793@twin.jikos.cz>
 <20140514155759.GB9723@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
 <20140514182046.GA13342@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1405151727380.16459@pobox.suse.cz>
 <CAKMK7uFEjDGSpdB0xDPL09GZ8N7aFrNA530HbRLyfTPx5SkLQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140607120614.GB5309@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
 <20140607231124.GA3611@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
 <CAKMK7uEALofLiEA3m-QKjygC=YZNjaEtUMfbpbXinMoim1ygkw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEALofLiEA3m-QKjygC=YZNjaEtUMfbpbXinMoim1ygkw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon 2014-06-09 11:25:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > that it worked for a while.
> 
> git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about
> the 5th report or so that claims this is the culprit but it's
> something else. The above code is definitely not used in i915 so bogus
> bisect result.

Note I did not do the bisect, I only attempted revert and test.

And did three boots of successful s2ram.. only to find out that it
does not really fix s2ram, I was just lucky :-(.

Unfortunately, this means my s2ram problem will be tricky/impossible
to bisect :-(.

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html