From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751396AbaFMNUK (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:20:10 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49658 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbaFMNUI (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:20:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:20:03 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Robert Richter , Tomasz Nowicki Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, bp@suse.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] APEI: Make APEI architecture independent. Message-ID: <20140613132003.GF4751@pd.tnic> References: <1402657380-18539-1-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> <20140613131423.GZ27560@rric.localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140613131423.GZ27560@rric.localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > Btw, it would be easier to wait a bit with reposting a new patch set > until there are no further comments expected for *all* patches (I > didn't have the time to look through all patches yet). Yes, a patchset version a week roughly should be fine. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --